User talk:Yesm8welldonem8

March 2016
Hello, I'm The Voidwalker. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Lilly Singh— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -- The Voidwalker  Discuss 22:12, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Trentham High School. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. GABHello! 22:39, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Joe Derbyshire


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Joe Derbyshire, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It is unambiguous vandalism or an obvious hoax. (See section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia; doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. JamesG5 (talk) 22:57, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

April 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Thomas Becket has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:33, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Thomas Becket was changed by Yesm8welldonem8 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.864081 on 2016-04-04T21:33:21+00:00.

April 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Damn Daniel has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:29, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Damn Daniel was changed by Yesm8welldonem8 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.928721 on 2016-04-08T11:29:19+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Willy Wonka. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Sam Sailor Talk! 12:01, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Donald Trump's The Art of the Deal: The Movie, you may be blocked from editing. Sam Sailor Talk! 12:02, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Hello, I'm Dcirovic. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Judaism— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dcirovic (talk) 13:32, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. --Bongwarrior (talk) 14:27, 4 May 2016 (UTC)