User talk:Yiannisdsp

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Yiannisdsp/sandbox/Aquila Hotels & Resorts


A tag has been placed on User:Yiannisdsp/sandbox/Aquila Hotels & Resorts, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Edible Melon (talk · contribs · block user) 10:36, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Aquila Hotels & Resorts


A tag has been placed on Aquila Hotels & Resorts, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Britishfinance (talk) 22:28, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

February 2020
Hello Yiannisdsp. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Yiannisdsp. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. kingboyk (talk) 22:30, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

My answer February 2020
Hello, I really do not know where you came to the conclusion that I was paid to create the article. This is the one and the only article I have made and I'm not a professional. And the sour is, I'm not trying to make any kind, as you said, of "black hat".I am a very good friend of the Daskalandonaki family, it is one of the most historic families in Greece and I tried to leave their footprint on their history in Wikipedia.

The Daskalantonakis family changed the whole history in relation to economics on the Crete island. They create a strong base for the development of tourism, more than 60 years ago and they were followed them many others, they were the pioneers in the Tourism area, in Crete island. Before thems all the Crete was based on the rural economy but today the Crete is based on the tourism economy

Now, in the last 15 years, the family was create one more strong healthy company with historic hotels, and that hotels count more than 50 years of history...

--> You deleted my first article and realized that you were right because I have focused on the company today and not its history and history of the family. I rewrote the article, but before this, I visit and was reading other similar articles. I also extracted all the direct links and adjusted the texts.

As I wrote before, I read other articles by corresponding companies that existing in Wikipedia, like "Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts", "Grecotel"(including that Grecotel company also started from Daskalantonakis family),"Aman Resorts" and adapted the Aquila article accordingly.

I will appreciate it If someone can explain to me because as I wrote before this is my first article, why all these articles like Aman Resorts or Four Seasons is good for the Wikipedia and the articles about the Aquila Hotels is not, what is the difference between the article for Aquila SA is. and the Four Season article? maybe has a problem with the photos? I must take off thems? If this is a problem ok I can take off. If you can help me with this I will appreciate.

Thank you
 * Even if you aren't paid, you still have a strong Conflict of Interest. —  Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) (click me!)    03:52, 27 February 2020 (UTC)


 * After reading WP:IBA and WP:PEACOCK, you can disclose your conflict of interest and submit the draft at WP:AFC. — Sago tree spirit  (talk) 03:57, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

AQUILA HOTELS & RESORTS moved to draftspace
I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — Sago tree spirit  (talk) 03:56, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Aquila Hotels & Resorts


A tag has been placed on Draft:Aquila Hotels & Resorts, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Sulfurboy (talk) 04:16, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 04:20, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Aquila Hotels & Resorts


A tag has been placed on Aquila Hotels & Resorts, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Britishfinance (talk) 14:30, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Blocked
You have continued to violate WP:COI and WP:PROMO and have now violated WP:MEAT. Enough. You are blocked. WP:GAB explains how to contest this block. --Yamla (talk) 10:42, 11 March 2020 (UTC)