User talk:Yibofeng3/Evaluate an Article

Yibofeng3 (talk) 09:09, 27 January 2023 (UTC)Dashboard.wikiedu.org evaluate article

Yibofeng3 (talk) 22:29, 27 January 2023 (UTC)===== Which article are you evaluating? =====

Archaeology

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archaeology

Yibofeng3 (talk) 22:31, 27 January 2023 (UTC)===== Why you have chosen this article to evaluate? =====

The article I chose is about archaeology, because I am more interested in history, so I am very happy to learn and discuss about archaeology. My first impression of the article is that it is very rich in content and defines archeology as a discipline that studies human activities. The article introduces some famous antiquarians, tells the development of archaeological method, its purpose and some cases of field investigation. The article contains many archaeological sites and photos of excavated cultural relics, which can provide readers with a more realistic feeling and a more direct understanding of the archaeological site.

Yibofeng3 (talk) 22:32, 27 January 2023 (UTC)===== Evaluate the article =====

This article mainly describes the definition of archeology and the relationship with anthropology, and expounds that the purpose of archeology is to understand the development of human beings, and the content of the article is related to the theme. The article refers to a total of 162 sources, and most of them are from official websites, articles, books, and most of the links are valid and supported by reliable second-hand information sources. Articles contain images that enhance understanding of the subject matter, such as photographs of some prominent antiquarians, as well as photographs of archaeological sites and unearthed artifacts. The article is rich in content, involving many aspects, including the introduction of archaeologists, the theory, method, purpose of archaeology, examples of field visits, and discussion research. But the content of the part of Holocaust Archeology is questionable, because in the talk page it was mentioned that this part may be copied and pasted from someone's online article, and some references do not provide links to directly enter the web page, so the two mentioned above This section may need improvement.