User talk:Yilinganna/Electricity sector in China

Peer Review
Peer Review


 * 1) Neutral Voice
 * 2) A strong neutral voice was maintained in both the presentation of many facts pertaining to China, a country that faces much bias and discrimination. Particularly, the Implementation and Challenges maintained a great neutral voice, as speaking on the shortcomings of a country may sometimes come off as charged.
 * 3) Honestly, I did not read any sentences that were not neutral in tone-  the author does a great job of keeping a balanced article.
 * 4) Close Paraphrasing and Plagiarism
 * 5) I scoured the article for any plagiarized/ closely paraphrased sentences and could not find any. If anything, perhaps be cautious with the sentences with statistical information, as perhaps the reference source was presented in a similar manner.
 * 6) Readability
 * 7) The very initial introduction to this topic has great readability, as it presents what the reader is about to be learning well. Also, the readability in the storage section has an easy to follow flow, which is super helpful when dealing with more complex topics of economic imports and reserves.
 * 8) A sentence that could improve its readability, I highlighted the exact sentences I’m noting above, is in the Natural Gas section. I was confused pertaining to the stats of different types of gas imports, and I believe maybe only one gas of importance for the section should be mentioned in imports. Otherwise, it may become jumbled.
 * 9) This article has already been well vetted for spelling or grammar errors. I kept my eyes alert throughout each read through for any mistakes, and did not find any.
 * 10) Rubric
 * 11) Intro Sentence
 * 12) The topic sentence for each paragraph does a good job introducing the new topics. Some may argue that they should be broader/ more encompassing like a thesis statement, but that does not make sense in the format of this Wiki article.
 * 13) Summary
 * 14) The author does summarize all major points in this article. She chose a trickier article subject and did a great job summarizing large aspects within it.
 * 15) Context
 * 16) Context is sufficient to understand the importance. If anything, the author may have to go to the very first intro paragraph in the article and add her additions in there for the article’s road map.
 * 17) Organization
 * 18) There are very clear headings/ subheadings. Transitions and language are appropriate.
 * 19) Content
 * 20) All the content is relevant and contributes greatly to the overall article.
 * 21) Balance
 * 22) Yes, this was definitely a balanced article. If anything, it may be too balanced as there is no critical feedback on China’s energy sector from the author.
 * 23) Tone
 * 24) Appropriate tone.
 * 25) Images
 * 26) The author could add more images, as I do not believe she has any currently.
 * 27) Citations
 * 28) The author has many citations, which are easy to access and spot.
 * 29) Sources
 * 30) Good academic sources that are referenced throughout the article.
 * 31) Final Questions/ Considerations
 * 32) The author’s greatest strength is strong writing in presentation of information and connecting subheading’s relevance to the overall topic.
 * 33) The author could improve the article by adding a couple images with captions, but this is an easy addition.
 * 34) This is a great article, Anna! There are honestly not many changes for the final publication! I learned a lot from your information.

Hungrywolvesgrind (talk) 17:30, 8 March 2024 (UTC)