User talk:YipH

Uploading photos
When uploading a better version of the photo, just use "Upload a new version of this file" option to replace old one with a new one in the future --Bololabich (talk) 19:25, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Blocked
After being warned that you shouldn't make racial comments on Wikipedia, you then went ahead and restored such comments and with an additional racial comment in your edit summary (see this edit. Wikipedia will not tolerate racist behaviour on any level and as a result you've been blocked from editing Wikipedia. Canterbury Tail   talk  16:05, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.

I am not sure what your problem is, I reverted that edit because I thought you unreasonably overuled J's edit on why that sentence was removed in the first place. Then afterwards I read the history log and saw the reason for the edit and the link to the source and then I understood and so I undid my edit. Does that make sense now? Go check my history and the page history yourself if you want.

You shouldn't jump to conclusions, not everyone is out to get you, maybe you need understand people more instead of spending so much time on wikipedia stirring up drama.

I pressed enter by accident, but my message continues, I would like to be unblocked, I would like to contribute to this site for the improvement of the internet.

.

Why are you asking me this? Shouldn't you have checked the revision history like I told you to? If you don't understand, here is the time line, I made a request to edited the article to remove the questionable stat, then J honored my request, by stating that the stats were not supported. good. and then Cant overuled J for no good reason, so I sided with J and reverted cant's edit, then I looked at the history and walter stated why he reverted the first time (excellent, just like how it should be done), so i agree with walter and reverted my own edit.

So now does that make sense. Can you unblocked me, I would like to contribute to this website.


 * I'm asking you because you insulted other editors in a highly inappropriate fashion. I did check the revision history of the Canada article to try and find out who added that information but gave up when it was already there back in 2009, thousands of edits ago. Have you checked the revision history before concluding the person who added it was Indian? On what basis did you assess their cleanliness? Huon (talk) 19:35, 16 September 2017 (UTC)


 * You reinstated talk page comments containing the text "I don't appreciate indians (especially ones who troll wikipedia) always trying to sneak in their indian bias and false information into Wikipedia articles." and at the same time made an edit summary containing the text "J also did state that the indian did not give a source". Do you honestly not see what is wrong with this? Canterbury Tail   talk  21:52, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia should be fair, accurate and neutral. There have been too many indian trolls on wikipedia trying to unfairly promote their country and it is annoying, a lot of other muslim people and white people don't like indian people either when they do this, perhaps you need to speak to other people about these indian trolls too. No one gives a damn about india.

This time I made an edit, i was corrected by walter, i originally thought you unjustly overuled J and that wasn't right so I immediately reverted the edit you did to J, then i clicked history and saw the reason and walter gave the source, so he was right. You did not give a source, too bad, why should i listen to you? However walter did give the source and reason for the edit, and I respect that, so I reverted the edit. why are you making a big deal out of this? Did I hurt you? Too bad, don't be so sensitive, you don't see anyone else complaining and blocking users because of something so petty. All I want to do it help wikipedia for the internet, so I should be unblocked. — Preceding unsigned comment added by YipH (talk • contribs)


 * There are trolls of any number of nationalities. It is unacceptable to assume that all Indian editors are trolls. Further, Indian editors are hardly the only ones "trying to unfairly promote their country"; the discretionary sanctions that exist for articles about the India-Pakistan conflict are pretty good testament to that. —C.Fred (talk) 22:17, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Ok, I understand your point, indian people have been beaten by muslims for hundreds of years and they have an inferiority complex and feel like they have to try and show up the superior muslims, but that doesn't mean they should troll wikipedia for edits, I was just trying to correct the wrong that indian people are putting out on wikipedia. You can agree to correcting a wrong edit right? I do have a strong sense of righteousness and if I see someone trolling on wikipedia I will try to correct it, this time it was indian because they do it so often. I can be more careful in the future by asking for a source for their trolling, but they won't be able to provide one, so then that will stop them in their tracks.

But Fred, I do appreciate you taking the time and explaining it out, unlike some people who just get upset and block someone abruptly without getting all the facts.

I would like to continue to contribute to wikipedia, I am very well read and want to share my knowledge.

September 2017
 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. Huon (talk) 12:17, 17 September 2017 (UTC)