User talk:YisraelZeffren

Hillary Clinton email controversy
Hello! Thank you for wanting to improve Wikipedia. But everything you add must be sourced to a Reliable Source. You must not add content that is your own opinion, or argumentative, or that is not based on a reliable source. You added such material twice to the article Hillary Clinton email controversy and it has been removed twice. Don't add it again. If you want to discuss whether it should be in the article, start a discussion at Talk:Hillary Clinton email controversy. --MelanieN (talk) 19:35, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

April 2018
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Hillary Clinton email controversy. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:18, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:41, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

I have since gone to Muboshgu account and looked at the history of his edits, and the majority of them are indiscriminate deletions of other user's proper additions or clarifications to the respective articles? I see that this user has a long history of such disruptive behavior and I would suggest an audit on all of his edits as they appear to be non-factual and actually rising to the level of Vandalism. Thank you

Discretionary sanctions alerts
Doug Weller talk 08:43, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Note that one of the possible sanctions is to simply ban you from these articles, allowing you to edit other articles. Doug Weller talk 08:44, 23 April 2018 (UTC)