User talk:Yjdefh/sandbox

Talk.

Tag team (37) There is a tag team at work in these two articles, on Galileo and the Galileo affair. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.199.165.33 (talk) 11:05, 21 November 2015 (UTC) A Trotskyite tag team has been at work on these two articles since 2013. Darouet decided to use the Galileo affair as a Trotskyite tract in 2010, but only started to do so in Wikipedia in 2013. Although in Britain, DVdm is the main supporter of the tag team in Boston in America. Not an official member, although in America, is Editor2020. DVdm's spelling is so odd at times that we wonder if he is sober. The two members of the tag team, Darouet and Thucydides411, are Trotskyites and in Boston in America. They might know each other. In the article on Galileo Galilei, on 7/5/2015 and 12/5/2015, Thucydides411 called a restoration of the original text vandalism. He never said that the same wording was vandalism for years. Thus the same text is and is not vandalism, according to the self-contradictory clown Thucydides411. Every liar in Wikipedia calls his opponents vandals. As with many tag teams, there is a leader and junior supporters. If a fact does not fit into a Leftist belief system, it is simply deleted. Darouet has done this twice, with ancient geocentrism and Galileo's mistake about the comets. The true remark, that most ancients supported geocentrism, has been deleted about four times now. It was deleted on 23/7/2014 by Editor2020 with the edit summary "Trim". Darouet has deleted the true remark three times, on 9/5/2013, 17/12/2013 and 25/7/2014. Reasons given are "Black" "theologian and historian", "not sourced" and no reason. The word "Trim" seems to a favourite with Editor2020, as he often uses it. Darouet must think that he is a genius. The ancient geocentrism stood in the article for years and was read by thousands, who all approved of it. He thinks these thousands are all idiots and deletes the remark they approved of. The thousands did not ask for a source, as statements of the obvious are not sourced in Wikipedia or outside it, for that matter. Darouet deleted the ancient geocentrism from the article on the Galileo affair, but leaves it standing in the many other Wikipedia articles mentioning it. If he can't bear the sight of a true statement, he should delete it in every place it appears. As it is, he is a self-contradictory clown. When putting his fake source "Black" into the Galileo Galilei article on 18/2/2014, Darouet produced the edit summary "Biblical quotes in worldview context". The word "worldview" seems to have been translated from the German. It could be said to have been partly transliterated from German. Darouet's peacock verbiage "immensely popular" is falsely said by him to have been sourced by him in the "main article". At that time, 24/2/2014, he had only made nine edits in the article on Galileo, all of which contain nothing faintly resembling a source for the peacock verbiage. Peacock verbiage is too vague to be sourced, anyway. Darouet must think that the readers of Wikipedia are utterly thick. When charged with repetition, he said, on 26/2/2014, that his repetitions are needed by the possibly billions of Wikipedia readers. Darouet is not the only one who uses non-existent sources. DVdm used non-existent "references are in the next" on 30/4/2014 in the article on the Galileo affair. This was said by him as alleged proof of Darouet's lies. Darouet gives others contradictory orders and wastes their time. He orders others to produce a "source" and then deletes it without giving a reason for the deletion. He did this in the article on the Galileo affair on 25/7/2014 and 22/6/2015. First person singular pronouns appear in Darouet's attempts at science. On 4/3/2014, he said "I'm tired of this". His big "I" is his alleged answer to charges of mendacity. His emotional needs are seen as proof of his geographical claims. The tag team's silly lie, that Galileo spent "the remainder of his life under house arrest" in Arcetri, was posted on 24/2/2014. It has been posted and re-posted ever since, with no attempt at proof. Galileo actually was in Rome, Siena and Florence at times. In any other article in Wikipedia, peacock verbiage like "immensely popular" would be deleted immediately. Dava Sobel said much the same thing, without its being deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.155.20.157 (talk) 11:10, 21 November 2015 (UTC)