User talk:Yllosubmarine/Archive 3

August 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter
The August 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated delivery by BrownBot 14:08, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Wikimania in Atlanta
Hey, Maria. I'm letting you know about our bid to get next year's Wikimania held in Atlanta. I'm going to leave the general template on your page, which may or may not apply to you (I don't know if you've edited Georgia-related articles), but I figured you may want to know about the bid anyway. Plus, we need all the help we can get in the next year or so, so I'd sign the Southeast team page if you can help in any capacity, online or in person. It's all appreciated. :) Mike H. I did "That's hot" first! 23:36, 1 September 2007 (UTC)



The Novels WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XVI - September 2007
The September 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 09:51, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Rushdie
Does the Booker prize specify that the author is known by the country they are born in rather than country of residence or their nationality? Rushdie is a British citizen (and a knight at that), and his own page page specifies his nationality as British. Cheers, Mi re  ma  re  17:53, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I believe his nationality is what should be listed, as that seems the purpose of the column, rather than the location of birth. His article specifies "United Kingdom" as his nationality (which it certainly is, as the fact he has a knighthood confirms), and I don't think we should have conflicting nationalities on these pages. If anything, I would suggest listing Indian after British if you feel it is necessary. Cheers, Mi re  ma  re  19:13, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't understand what you mean, are you disputing his nationality? And it's not up to us to decide which nation is more relevant to his work, that's original research. Mi re  ma  re  19:29, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm pretty sure non-Brits are only entitled to an honorary knighthood, such as that awarded to Rudolph Giuliani. Anyway, you say that to exclude India as his country of origin would be incorrect, but you don't think excluding his British nationality is incorrect? Correct me if I'm wrong, but I was under the impression that the column in question supposed to contain the nationality of the winner? In which case he is British, as confirmed in his article, and it is misleading to describe him on this list as Indian. Mi re  ma  re  19:56, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Films roll call
Hey fellow Wikipedian! Your username is listed on the WikiProject Films participants list, but we are unsure as to which editors are still active on the project. If you still consider yourself an active WP:FILM editor, please add your name to the Active Members list. You may also wish to add   to your userpage, if you haven't done so already. We also have several task forces that you may be interested in joining as well. Also, elections for Project Coordinators are currently in sign-up phase. If you would be interested in running, or would like to ask questions of the candidates, please take a look. You can see more information on the positions at WikiProject Films/Coordinators. Thanks and happy editing! An automatic notification by BrownBot 01:45, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Binoche
Wikipedia is the only place that does filmographies from oldest to newest. It looks like garbage, but I could care less about it. Things like that are why Wikipedia will never be a reliable source for anything.Smartissexy 22:07, 20 September 2007 (UTC) ''Also, what you are referencing is bibliographies, and a filmography isn't a bibliography.Smartissexy 22:10, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

In more general terms, could I ask that instead of slapping the MOSLOW tag on lists, as you did on Catherine Deneuve, you fix the problem yourself? Javascript code is available to assist you, at no charge. Thankyou. --El Ingles 00:29, 21 September 2007 (UTC)


 * OK, I had an idle 10 minutes, I did it myself. Cheers. --El Ingles 16:31, 21 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Jane Birkin, too. --El Ingles 17:06, 21 September 2007 (UTC)


 * ....and just to make life REALLY easy for you, here's a very simple list inverter utility. Cheers --El Ingles 21:34, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Jacksonville
I am currently working to gather support for a WikiProject Jacksonville and would like to know if you're interested in helping to contribute to this. Thanks! JaxDaily 20:12, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Feel free to come over and comment on, add suggestions to and discuss the | WikiProject Jacksonville proposal. JaxDaily 23:22, 22 September 2007 (UTC)


 * It's alive! Unfortunately WP:J was taken but we have some other shortcuts - for example, WP:JX. Hopefully this will allow us to improve Jacksonville pages! JaxDaily 09:57, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Oprah/Towelie
Pretty sure my edits were in the spirit of the article, reinforcing the criticism of the quasi-cult that exists around Oprah and which is discussed throughout the rest of the article. 58.7.132.126 13:01, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm afraid I really must maintain that my edits were in good faith. 58.7.132.126 09:34, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

WikiCookie
Here is a WikiCookie in recognition of your efforts with the WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive. Psych less  00:50, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Oprah's Book Club
Hi, just a friendly note. I've noticed of late that you have done a great deal of work on the Oprah's Book Club page. While I do appreciate all of your hardwork, I must ask that you refrain from reverting the changes that other users make. Simply put, this is not your page; it is shared by the entire community. Recent information about the latest book club selection is important and is credible; responding to the users who post that information by saying "Wikipedia is not a blog" is both rude and unnecessary. While you are correct that it is not a blog, it is also not an encyclopedia as you have stated you wish it to be. Please keep that in mind while reverting other people's edits. Thank you! Flexpedition 3:21, 1 October 2007

While I hate to once again disagree with you...please read the guidelines yourself: "Individual scheduled or expected future events should only be included if the event is notable and almost certain to take place." Since Oprah.com - the most reliable source for Oprah's book club - has announced that a new selection will take place then it is absolutely true that the event is notable and will take place on Friday, October 5th. Therefore I am undoing your revert once again, though I predict you will probably challenge it. Please remember that Wikipedia is a collaborative project, meant to be used and edited by everyone who chooses to. While you may have the opinion that the information posted is unnecessary the fact is not everyone shares that opinion. Besides that, the announcement will take place Friday and this entire matter will be dropped.

Finally, after re-reading the first sentence, I have not changed my opinion. You should be aware that Wikipedia is NOT an encyclopedia by the standard definition of one which would not lend itself to being edited at anytime by anyone; it is instead a web-based, collaborative encyclopedic effort (hence the name, and the definition).

I do apologize for the signature mix-up, but we all make mistakes. Godspeed. (Flexpedition 01:39, 2 October 2007 (UTC)) 21:41, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

You've come up with a fair solution. Though I agree that the sentence itself could be improved, please remember that I am not the one who wrote it, yet it still seems unnecessary to call someone's words poor. Constructive criticism is sometimes a better choice.

Thank you for your time, and consideration. It is obvious that you are not a vandal; I regret any inference that could be made by the term "warned" though I was simply at a loss for space in the explanation. Be well. (Flexpedition 02:53, 2 October 2007 (UTC))22:53, 2 October 2007

Thank you for cleaning up the lead; the page is much easier to read, now. Great work! (Flexpedition 23:19, 5 October 2007 (UTC)) 19:24, 5 October 2007

WikiProject Films September 2007 Newsletter
The September 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Please note that special delivery options have been reset and ignored for this issue due to the revamp of the membership list (outlined in further detail in the newsletter). If you would like to change your delivery settings for future issues, please follow the above link. I apologize for the inconvenience. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 00:22, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Biography Newsletter 5
To receive this newsletter in the future, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated R Delivery Bot 16:09, 7 October 2007 (UTC).

Novels Collaboration of the Month
You supported The Handmaid's Tale, which has been selected as the Novels WikiProject's new Collaboration of the Month. Please help improve this article towards featured article standard. EncycloPetey 12:47, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XVII - October 2007
The October 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot -- 10:01, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Re: Catholic League
Thanks. I'll do my best not to get riled and confirm his worst instincts about the 'pedia. Best regards, Liquidfinale (Ţ) (Ç) (Ŵ) 20:14, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

The Gathering
Hi. Thanks for moving The Gathering and fixing the disambiguation links. I created the article yesterday and wasn't sure what the best title for it was. Bláthnaid 23:07, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

David Adkins
While I was in the wrong for my first edit that you deleted, the on for David Adkins(aka sinbad) is fully supported with sources and a valid bit of pop news to be added to his profile How is a link to the government site with his name and the amount owed not considered valid for an online encyclopedia. Any such events that occur are valid to add to the profile of a public figure. —Preceding unsigned comment added by BartvsSpaceMutants (talk • contribs) 16:00, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

WPMT Roll Call and COTM
 WPMT Roll Call and Collaboration of the Month! You're receiving this message because you are currently listed as a member of WikiProject Musical Theatre. Please post at the talk page to let us know if you're still with the project. Feel free to post on the talk page about what musical theatre-related work you're doing or to weigh in on the current discussions on the talk page.

Nominations for our Collaboration of the Month are currently being accepted. What should we focus on for the month of November? Any input would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks much, folks! Happy editing! &mdash;  Music  Maker  5376  04:59, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

You're right, it isn't.
But the text OVER it was pointless, sorry about removing the necessary, I was only trying to remove the text outside the box. TheBlazikenMaster 18:10, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Los Angeles Times
Does this work? I'm at my part-time job at the university library, so I may have more access to certain news websites than the typical web surfer. If the URL works, please implement it! —Erik (talk • contrib) - 19:56, 23 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Great! I just Google searched the headline, and for some reason, subscription-only headlines can be circumvented by accessing the URL in the search results.  Just a tip for the future! ;) —Erik (talk • contrib) - 20:01, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Doris Lessing
Why was the quotes section removed? I am re-adding it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.193.220.27 (talk) 18:01, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Template:Madeleine L'Engle
Hi. I don't mind your redoing the Madeleine L'Engle template to make it more uniform and, er, subtle. However, the way it is now, the graphic, which I spent hours designing way-back-when, floats off to the right, halfway down the template, where it looks terrible. Is there a way to retain your improvements but use the image in a low-key way where it will actually look decent? I experimented a little, but my experience with this kind of syntax is minimal and nothing worked well. Can you help? Thanks! -- Karen | Talk | contribs 07:19, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Achebe, Hughes, and Sunshine
Hey there. Thanks for the vote of support at the Chinua Achebe FAC. I was glancing at your userpage and noticed you started the page for the Hughes Brothers – well done. Dead Presidents is one of my favorite films, so I'm glad to see their page is in good hands. (I wasn't so into American Pimp, given the lack of screen time they gave to the women and the scant attention paid to the violence inherent in the system.)

I also notice you're in Florida – which part, if you don't mind my asking? I grew up in Gainesville, and the harsh Wisconsin winters make me homesick sometimes. Cheers! – Scartol  ·  Talk  14:20, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Films October 2007 Newsletter
The October 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 21:23, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XVIII - November 2007
The November 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot -- 16:01, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Review Request
Hey, Maria. You've been quite helpful in the past, knowledgeable about Wikipedia and whatnot. Was wondering if you might review To Kill a Mockingbird for me. It passed GA yesterday, and I'd like to know where to focus to improve it for FA. It was up for peer review at WP:Novels, but it got a tepid response, and has changed quite a bit since then. I appreciate anything you can do. Thanks. --Moni3 13:08, 9 November 2007 (UTC)Moni3

Dwarf Talk
Hola! "Welcome to Miami, Bienvenido a Miami"--Keer lls ton 02:32, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Geneology
- you say on your userpage you're German/Austrian (50%) and Mexican/Spanish (50%) - but how far back do you go? do you have double nationality?--Keer lls ton 02:32, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
 * so you're 50% German, 50% Spanish, 100% American? :D--Keer lls ton 15:43, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Knut
Thanks, I intended to help. I wanted to say I supported it's candidateship when I first read it, but I don't see how supporting really means much both since an upgrade requires consensus, not majority vote and since while many articles are strong in one area they are weak in another. I hope my comments help Knut (polar bear) improve it into FA status.--Keer lls ton 15:43, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I forgot to say I'm new to this stuff too :D--Keer lls ton 02:56, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Review Comments
I believe one can be extremely proud and extremely civil at the same time. I try to be.--Keer lls ton 13:57, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * "but I don't want to create difficulties by being too strong in my interactions with other users. People get blocked for that." - People get blocked for personal attacks/being uncivil - for intentionally acting against policy. Strength in interactions with others is not a banning offense, or even an offense.--Keer lls ton 02:56, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Could you help me out?
Patricia Reilly Giff‎ and the related articles, are in real bad shape, I know you are a constant contributor to literature related articles, I was hoping you could help me improve them. Sincerely, --Keer lls ton 23:33, 5 December 2007 (UTC) I like to use wiktionary for definitions --Keer lls ton 03:51, 6 December 2007 (UTC) Why wouldn't you like to work with me? I assure you I am usually not bitingly sarcastic - or rude/uncivil - I intentionally try not to be either. It seems she's a rather interesting person, and has won awards - isn't your interest peaked at all? --Keer lls ton 00:48, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * So you're not interesting in improving that article? Why? - has personal emnity due to my objection(s) to Knut gone so far? -or do you not like that kind of literature?
 * As to the definition of discount - dis meaning taking away from - count meaning counting - I think there is no simpler definition and no truer definition

Emily Dickinson
...I see... - - - ...  ...   ...   I'm very sorry to have disturbed you. I wished to cooperate with you to counter the bad blood we had over Knut (polar bear) - I am not usually a bad guy... given your strident request - I accede. --Keer lls ton 10:20, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Help me 1.01
we were all going direct to Heaven, we were all going direct the other way--in short, the period was so far like the present period, that some of its noisiest authorities insisted on its being received, for good or for evil, '''in the superlative degree of comparison only'''.

Could you help me?

"superlative degree of comparison" - comparing amount of evil/good or the greatness? - "more evil" and "more good" vs "good" and "evil" -or instead -"great man" vs. "insignificant"?

Is there an ambiguity inherent to the passage? or does it refer to both?

- Dickens is not Dickinson - I'm hoping you can help me on one.

Thanks in advance

--Kiyarr lls ton 03:26, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry. The passage is from the opening to A Tale of Two Cities...
 * The context of that sentence, from the beginning of the book to the paragraph after the sentence, goes:
 * Book the First--Recalled to Life

I

The Period

It was the best of times, it was the worst of times,

it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness,

it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity,

it was the season of Light, it was the season of Darkness, it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair,

we had everything before us, we had nothing before us,

we were all going direct to Heaven, we were all going direct

the other way--in short, the period was so far like the present

period, that some of its noisiest authorities insisted on its

being received, for good or for evil, in the superlative degree

of comparison only.

There were a king with a large jaw and a queen with a plain face,

on the throne of England; there were a king with a large jaw and

a queen with a fair face, on the throne of France. In both

countries it was clearer than crystal to the lords of the State

preserves of loaves and fishes, that things in general were

settled for ever.
 * Any help would be appreciated.
 * I would very much like to know your response to that passage, and whether your interpretation on it is similar or dissimilar from my own.
 * --Kiyarr lls ton 14:45, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Wow... thanks a lot - took a while to understand it, but I finally did.
 * Nah, not discussed anywhere in Wikipedia (I think) just a personal concern of mine
 * Agreed, Dickens is very verbose :).
 * Once again, thanks.
 * Sincerely,
 * Kiyarr lls ton
 * message posted at 22:32, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Scotiabank Giller Prize
Thanks for the message, Maria. The issue of redirection hadn't occured to me. i'll get to fixing up my mess. Victoriagirl (talk) 19:34, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

novels by James Fenimore Cooper
Hello Maria..We talked a while ago about John Updike and Joyce Carol Oates...Anyway, I was wondering if you were aware of the horrendous fact that very few novels by classic author James Fenimore Cooper have a page of their own...One of them even gets redirected to his page! Whilst I fear I don't have enough time to read the books and create the pages atm, I was wondering if perhaps you did, in which case that would be great. Otherwise perhaps we could inform people from the WikiProject Novels about it? I tried to find their talkpage and do just that but I couldn't find the tab to create a new topic...Zigzig20s (talk) 11:06, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Knut (polar bear)
Hello. To Knut (polar bear), I added Hatkoff's book under "Further reading" hoping it adds value to the well-written article. Wishing you well with FA quest. Rosiestephenson (talk) 04:43, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Rashida Jones pic
Pls answer here. Thx..... 70.108.126.66@07:05,on 28 November 2007 (UTC).

Your reverts at Rashida Jones
Please stop reverting the Rashida Jones article. The issues with the images have been explained to you already. The article itself has been edited to follow the MOS. If you revert again, you will violate WP:3RR and will be reported. María ( habla con migo ) 20:10, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Y dont u stop reverting. Hurling threats? I'll rrepot u as well. U will also violate WP:3RR. If you issue is w the pic, y do u change the other edits in the article? 70.108.126.66 (talk) 01:58, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
 * You have been edit warring at this article just as much as the anon. Please stop reverting and pursue dispute resolution, or I will have to block you. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 04:34, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Knut
Hey María, I left a comment at Knut. I don't really see why fair use (even when it's clearly compliant with WP:NFCC) is so upsetting to some people. And of course, nobody would ever suggest that the encyclopedia never quote from an article from Vanity Fair which, legally speaking, is protected under the same fair use. For some reason there's a lot of non-lawyers who have incredibly dogmatic but somewhat inconsistent opinions about the whole "free content" thing. Oh well, one of those bizarre pieces of the WikiLandscape. If it comes down to it, I'd just say don't let the images discourage you. Javan Rhinoceros was recently promoted with no free images of the poor beasties alive. I could have put up a fair use image, and although it would improve the article a bit I don't think it's all that shabby not to have it... similar with the issue at hand -- either way, the article on Knut will still be beautifully illustrated.

How are you feeling about the process otherwise? A lot of first-comers (well, at least I did) find it really nerve-wracking and a bit discouraging at times. Some topics draw in a lot of commentators, but some really good articles don't get as much attention (lots of experts in science or literature; not as many in German polar bear media sensations ;) Good luck with it and let me know if I can be of help with this or whatever else. --JayHenry (talk) 07:24, 29 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Famous hippos, eh? I think we might be kindred WikiSpirits.  One of the first articles I ever created was William Johnson Hippopotamus.  Alas, I haven't been able to find enough information to take my friend Billy to good article status, let alone featured (and I live in constant, crippling, nightmares-all-night terror that the deletionists will go after him). --JayHenry (talk) 23:25, 29 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Good lord, I just noticed that poor little Knut has been drug into another unrelated squabble. This is one of the silliest FACs I've ever seen.  I'm really impressed with your patience through the process.  I'd have likely flipped out by now, gone to the zoo and killed Knut myself just to be done with it ;) --JayHenry (talk) 03:19, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Thank you that you changed my comments in the Knut article in "good" English as it is not my mother language. The "phenomena Knut" has raised some controversies in the German Wikipedia community because some think Knut is not worth to mention. I'm surprised how relaxed it is seen here. It is ok with the reverse of the Bild Zeitung text. Let me only say that the Bild Zeitung is by far the worst newspaper in Germany with a very bad background and I would use it only as toilet paper in the wood. Unfortunately, its influence as an opinion maker for the uneducated is undisputed. Have you already heard about the plans to make a movie about Knut? See here: http://www.spiegel.de/international/zeitgeist/0,1518,525955,00.html Luzymae —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.131.210.30 (talk) 15:09, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

You are fast - thank you Maria! Maybe you find it also interesting that the zoo's managing director lost his job lately despite making so much money. He did a very very good job, but I think they dismissed him because he wanted too much money in his new contract. The city of Berlin declared bankrupt and the allowances to the zoo were not so much. But there was always the discrepancy between making money and the protection of the animals. Happy 2008! Luzymae http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,522866,00.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.131.210.30 (talk) 15:41, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Hello
Always nice to meet another graduate student! We "lucky few" have to stick together. If you ever need a peer review or something, let me know. Awadewit | talk  14:44, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject_Novels/JobCentre
I have just set up the proposed page - as you showed interest I thought you might like to give it the once over and see what you thought. :: Kevinalewis  : (Talk Page) /(Desk)  12:43, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Done - also you might like to pick a role or two to have a bash at. Also if you would like to modify anything or rephrase anything at this stage - please do go ahead. :: Kevinalewis  : (Talk Page) /(Desk)  14:28, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Films November 2007 Newsletter
The November 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 02:28, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Christian Bale
Christian Bale isn't a Method actor. He himself has stated that he doesn't believe in the Method(using one's own memories and emotions). So if he himself has said it, then i'm pretty sure he isn't a Method actor. --Killingthedream 19:03, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Novels Collaboration of the Month
You supported Sons and Lovers, which has been selected as the Novels WikiProject's new Collaboration of the Month. Please help improve this article towards featured article standard. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kevinalewis (talk • contribs) 10:25, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XIX - December 2007
The December 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by KevinalewisBot -- 14:05, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

New thread
Yes, FACs that get bogged down like this can still pass. What's happening at Knut is hardly normal but unfortunately it does happen from time to time. Some reviewers have pet issues or just get hung up on a particular point and will go nuts if the point is not addressed. There's really only two things you can do: 1) be patient and 2) not be one of those people ;) My advice at Knut would be to just not respond to Kirlston anymore as he's clearly not being very reasonable, let him have the last word, and let Raul and Sandy interpret things -- they're generally quite fair.  As a worst case scenario they might restart the nomination, just to get the conversation back on track.  But I think failure at this point is highly unlikely.

If you do an author next you'll find there's a community of literature-focused reviewers who are all quite good and almost all quite reasonable. So what's your next FA, huh? One of your top ten favorites, perhaps? --JayHenry (talk) 00:41, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Btw, traditionally the nominator gets the honors of adding the featured article star to the article. The template to do so is. Congrats again. --JayHenry (talk) 00:08, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Commiseration
Thanks. It's clear to me that Kirlston shouldn't be involved in that article. As you said, he twists Wikipedia policies to his own ends. I could have come back on "policy", but I didn't feel like fighting with someone who is so irrepressible despite knowing nothing about the subject matter. We'll see what kind of mess he manages to make of the article. The way he is going, it could be a big one. Bathrobe (talk) 03:15, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations on getting your article on the front page of Wikipedia today! Bathrobe (talk) 08:57, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

The thing with feathers
I'd be honored to help out with Ms. Dickinson. I am indeed a bit swamped right now (hence the "is not" sign), but if you can give me a week or maybe two, I'll be more than happy to give it a thorough going-over. She's a most important lady, and one of American letters' more intriguing characters. (Which, given the odd character of US writers, is saying something, heh.) Thanks too for your kind comments about my FA scribbling. It was a bright spot on a rather wearying day. Cheers! – Scartol  •  Tok  19:34, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I haven't forgotten! I'll do more reviewing soon, I promise. =) Cheers. – Scartol  •  Tok  05:08, 29 December 2007 (UTC)


 * María, I would like to see your top ten "OMG WTH" list of American writers that you mentioned on Scartol's talk. I think this could be a very useful resource for future generations of scholars on Wikipedia. --JayHenry (talk) 21:03, 15 December 2007 (UTC)


 * A valuable list which, through the power of the Wiki, will likely come to redefine our understanding of American Literature. Though not a literary scholar, I believe I am an expert on OMG WTH and to my mind, Hemingway and Twain, great writers indisputably, do not qualify for the WTH which represents a sort of shock and chaos.  They are bold writers to be sure, but at no point in A Farewell to Arms did I say, "OMG WTH FredHenry!"  I would add Hunter S. Thompson and Kurt Vonnegut instead.  Possibly Thomas Pynchon moves onto my list instead of Capote.  Pynchon elicits relatively less OMG, but a very great deal of WTH.  It's a complicated area of scholarship and I'm glad someone with such keen insight as yourself is delving into it. --JayHenry (talk) 20:45, 16 December 2007 (UTC)


 * You're quite welcome, and I'm happy to help. I just wish my high school students were so grateful when I tell them what to improve in their writing! =) And BTW, please don't refer to yourself as a "nobody". Your dedication to knowledge and strong work ethic make you a somebody among somebodies. Cheers! – Scartol  •  Tok  15:37, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Congratulations
I was watching Emily Dickinson after seeing it go up for GA. A worthy subject and a very good article. Well-deserved. --Moni3 (talk) 15:19, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Help help!
Hello my animal loving friend. Happy Holidays and (almost) New Year! I am in need of a competent copy editor. Could you cast your competent eye upon my poor little Sumatran Rhinoceros? I know these lengthy biology-focused articles might not be your thing, but I'm basically looking for someone who can just smooth it out a bit, let me know what parts seem awkward, etc. At the bottom of the FAC page, Tony1 left some pointers. Any help would be greatly appreciated. (btw, congrats on Emily Dickinson!) --JayHenry (talk) 03:39, 28 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Re: where to comment. Maybe leave detailed remarks at Talk:Sumatran Rhinoceros and just leave a comment at the FAC that you did a copy edit?  Thanks so much for your help.  I'm on Holiday this week so I might not be very responsive but will be back in full force early next week to address any questions you might have going through the text.  Thanks again! --JayHenry (talk) 22:27, 28 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks again for checking in on the beastie. I've done another round of edits and left comments at the FAC in response.  On a side note, I usually find vandalism completely tedious, but I must admit that this one on Knut made me chuckle. --JayHenry (talk) 05:13, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

League of Copyeditors roll call
Melon ‑ Bot  ( STOP! )  18:08, 28 December 2007 (UTC)