User talk:Yngvarr/Archive 3

The ongoing saga of Lamborghini man (or is it??)
So, Lambo Boy has come back to start crapping on about how the templates still don't fit his vision of them. Given a little peeking at his contribs I do reckon now we do have a multiple user account on our hands and as we know, it's a no-no and a blockable offense. So, we have one person with an interest in public transportation systems in and around Washington, one with an interest in cartoons. Both use the account and there's usually a few days lull inbetween the uses switching. Except for a few irregularities where the switch happens within hours and on occasions minutes its usually a case of buses, buses, buses, lull then TV, TV, TV, lull and the circle of life is complete. The fact one knows how to sign whereas the other patently doesn't know or doesn't want to sign is sending off five alarm warnings for me, it's either two people or a split personality case. Any idea what to do? It's almost as if whatever we've told him he's ignored and is proceeding as if he is still right in a sorta truthiness way. I'm not going to respond to his "idea" over at WT:TOON, it isn't worth my effort doing so because I really dislike repeating myself but it's possible this one has forgotten. treelo radda  04:06, 9 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Well, maybe I can throw him a carrot or something. The templates issues are a dead issue, and we won't go there anymore. Hopefully. As for his Sybil phenomena, it'll be a tough nut trying to dig up some sort of concise report to ANI about the no-sharing thing. As my experience shows, you can either be verbose and be ignored; or be concise and be ignored. It's just a matter of what phase the moon is in at that point. I will see how to work it out. Yngvarr (t) (c) 15:46, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I was thinking more along the lines of contacting a friendly neighborhood admin instead of ANI, we all know that's got you nowhere since you first did it although it has worked for me the two times I've used ANI. I think getting him off this template fixation would be good although I do reckon we're being read as he's started signing again just after I mentioned it so something is up. My evidence is vastly circumstantial but I think I have a case. treelo  radda  16:31, 9 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Dredging this up from a semi-quiescent state. I'm sure by now you've seen the most recent spate, but if not, seems to show he's still at it. I kind of feel better that he's warred with someone fairly disassociated with us; for me, at least, it only reinforces the questionable behavior he exhibits, but which I can't quite put in to words. Anyways, enough flowery oration. Just because he goes into sleeper mode doesn't mean the problem goes away, which I was kind of hoping. Do you have any idea of a "friendly neighborhood admin" we could ping? Yngvarr (t) (c) 21:56, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Not until August, for now you'd be better off giving him yet another final warning for edit-warring (he's recieved one before from me regarding the template issue) and then hitting up any admin with whom you've spoke to in the past, preferably one who's a bit loose with the banhammer when it comes to disruptive editors and multiple user accounts. For me that's either User:Gogo Dodo or User:PMDrive1061, both should be able to do a solid. treelo  radda  22:21, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * What happens in August? The world won't end until some time in 2012. Yngvarr (t) (c) 22:32, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Quiet, young padwan, August is around the time Chowder will be accepting RfA noms again. treelo  radda  22:50, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The first time I made some edits back in December I understand why you all were mad about that. I just edited the articles without no discussion. Didn't know how things were back then. I apologized for that. And the situation that happened in March regarding the Co-Productions thing, didn't completely know how it works until know. The reason Why I haven't discussed anything or edited anything since that incident and before yesterday is because I didn't see anything wrong. But when I stumbled upon the "Cartoon Network Studios Article" I noticed that there were lots of errors. So I thought it was OK to correct them without discussion because it really needed corrections, badly and nobody seemed to corrected them. I thought every thing was right until It was reverted it was back by somebody else. I was about to ask you or treelo about the whole thing, but I though it was OK because it obviously needs corrections. So if the sources for the changes I did are not reliable then I apologize for it. But something has to be done about the article because there are lots of errors on it, like Teen Titans. This show is placed in that article when it shouldn't be. Its Warner Bros. Animation, not a Cartoon Network Original or Co-Production. I already removed that because I know that should be that there. And a source is provided. So what can be done about the article? Once again I do apologize about before and I completely understand why you all were upset about this. ALSO, I DO NOT, I REPEAT DO NOT HAVE MULTIPLE ACCOUNTS. Where exactly did that even come from? And I didn't have any knowledge of this discussion you've been having about about me until this morning EST, when I clicked on your user name in the History of the Cartoon Network Studios Article. I hope you can forgive me, because I'm really sorry about this. Lamborghini man 1:55 April 18, 2009

(merp) How many times can I get edit conflicts? Right, I was going to give some good faith to your explanation right upto your last edit where you just took it away with the same aggressive tone you gave to Eugene Krabs yesterday. The problem here is you, it's always you and even though you seem to think you know how things are now it doesn't seem that way as its the same old shit just in a different place. This time you decided to do it for another list once again dealing with co-prods and once again in a nice display of being bold then saying "fuck that, I'm right" (or rather "FUCK THAT, IM RIGHT!!" as caps make your point more correct) upon being reverted in a small scale editwar. If you are consistently finding others aren't happy when it comes to your "fixing" things, the problem isn't everyone else. There does need to be a touch of cleanup on the article but you're not the guy to do it, leave a note on the talkpage if you get reverted about it but don't try and reassert your changes and move onto something less contentious. Read up on WP:BRD because you keep skipping the D part and cycle through B and R repeatedly when it comes to things like this. As for the accounts, not one person ever said you operated multiple accounts so I guess I came from yourself. What I said was that there's more than one person using the account and I'm yet to see any reason to figure otherwise and no, your saying there's only one person won't convince me. treelo radda  14:04, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
 * You're right I will. And you're right about the "I'm right, I'm always right" thing. I just want to apologize for what I have been doing. I promise you it won't happen again. I'll read up on WP:BRD. If I see something that I think needs attention, I'll bring it to the appropriate person. Or if I have a source that's really reliable, I'll automatically edit it. Also when you say, "What I said was that there's more than one person using the account", are you talking about different ip addresses on the account? That's because I moved. On January 30th, I moved to another apartment. I had to get another Cable Modem from Comcast and I got another Laptop too. The Comcast guy had to redo everything, he did something in Command Prompt I'm not sure what it was. Trust me nobody else is using my account, nobody. As far as Eugene goes, I'll admit I overreacted A LOT. I owe him a big apology. I hope all can be forgiven and we can start off fresh, you, Yngvarr, Eugene, and anybody else that may have been upset about this whole thing.Lamborghini man 14:55 April 18, 2009.
 * Start anew... hm. I'd like to but how do I or anyone else know that you won't end up pulling the same stuff again because I'm pretty certain you made with all the niceties with apologies and promises and all last time you were pulled up for this. I'm going to see what Yng says but for now I'm not considering anything of the good faith sort until such time you've proved you can keep your personal hellmouth closed and I don't mean for a few months until people have forgotten. If you're going to do this, don't bring it to any specific person, just add a new section to the talkpage of a given article and see what comes of it. When I say more than one person is using your account I mean more than one person is using your account, I'm still not sure if it is but if you can control your non-colaborative attitude nobody will care. What is so hard about adding four tildes? Learn to sign, sir. treelo  radda  15:45, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

(undent) To start with, I would like to reinforce the WP:BRD issue. The changes you've been making are controversial and have been reverted by three different people. I'm not necessarily interested in apologies, that's for you to discuss with Eugene. Disagreements are inevitable. How people deal with those disagreements is a good barometer. And I'm generally not a stickler for process of this nature. But so far, we're going in circles. What sources can you provide for the information which is in dispute? Wikipedia itself (in any language variant), wikias, and the pretty much any user-editable database is not considered reliable by the very nature of being user-editable. The article talk pages are usually a good place to start when you're considering making significant changes, and it is better to talk on article pages rather than user pages, so at least it can be peer-reviewed by any interested parties. Here is a good (recent) example of I how I see the whole thing coming together. I'll throw you some good faith, but we need an exhibition of your intentions, and so far, the Eugene Crabs interaction does not really fill me confidence. If you are serious in your claims, then again, we'll start at the beginning: use the talk page, bring forth something that we all can agree on. If your having a hard time with the reliable sources issue, there are a number of examples. If something is still unclear, then use the [Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard]] and get an outside opinion. Yngvarr (t) (c) 16:02, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Its all good between me and Eugene. I will use the talk page from now on.--Lamborghini man (talk) 16:36, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Can you also cut the shit in your summaries, they're really standoffish when you have something to prove. treelo  radda  17:06, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
 * My summaries, what are you talking about?--Lamborghini man (talk) 17:14, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Your edit summaries, you've been here long enough to know these things. Boy do you ever need a slight personality tweak, everything seems to come across as if the person who dares questions you is wrong. There are better ways to ask what something is than "what are you talking about?" as if they're crazy for saying it. treelo  radda  17:21, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I didn't know what you were talking about. You just said "summaries" at first. Now I know exactly what you're talking about. You're talking about the things I've been saying in the edit summaries. They won't happen again. I just want to start of fresh and new; doing this the right way.--Lamborghini man (talk) 17:30, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Huh.
Do you deal with Ben 10? I don't as you know, action series seem to attract bigger lunkheads than EEnE do and just dealing with the Transformers: Animated char list split annoyed the crap out of me. From what I see there's nobody who knows the difference between cruft and content to an acute enough degree to be able to tell the rest to stop adding the shit in, only the hardcore douches like yourself give a fuck. So, because of this I'd like to turn your attention to convincing the circlejerkers there to split the godawful rat king we call List of characters in Ben 10 (or rather List of Ben 10 characters because some fuck moved it against our own MOS) into more manageable chunks. I know, wrong venue but I figure here is good enough as most conversation will occur on the talkpage so no point drifting it out to WT:TOON. It's the single biggest issue for the Ben 10 archipelago as it requires some clipping and a spinout because of the length at a fairly hefty... wait... 114 kilobytes. That is more than both Ben 10 and Ben 10: Alien Force put together.

Problem is simple, a huge article with too much dross and that which is worth a damn needs splitting off so one list doesn't have to cover the whole Ben 10 Mythos. I'd suggest because of the way the series go to split out core characters to their own articles should content be found (sourcing is much heavier a demand on standalone articles so extra legwork will be needed, episodic references aren't any good) and split the rest down to heroes and villains or by series should enough content remain. Above all, make sure the title convention is adhered to and none of this List of Ben 10 villains or Ben Tennyson (Ben 10) bullcrap. treelo radda  01:57, 4 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Well, I have those on my watchlist, but mainly for blatant vandalism. I don't watch the show, so I can't really comment on content, but it should be kinda easy to spot the drivel from the rest. And while we're on the topic of "keeping an eye", I am about to step out for a bit, so if you have a chance, keep an eye on DVDfan12, he did not learn from his block, and now he's adding "Portugal air dates" to the episodes. After yesterday, I'm not of the mind to have a pleasant discussion with him on these things. Yngvarr (t) (c) 19:57, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
 * So you're leaving it to me to split the list up? It's a simple thing, just split it yourself and let them figure it out. I'd like to but I'm highly intolerant and will assume bad faith right away. I'll keep an eye on our over-enthusiastic kid editor here, I'm starting to doubt it being someone we know but is still far from being a good editor, young Mormon editors always seem very bull-headed and ignorant to a point to others. treelo  radda  20:58, 4 April 2009 (UTC)


 * No, that wasn't what I said. I meant to say "Ok, let me look at the talk page and see what's up". Yngvarr (t) (c) 21:25, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Damn your lack of clarity, damn it to hell. You're not Chowder, you don't get to make little sense in passing like he does. Don't bother looking at the talkpage, you get one passing IP suggesting a split but also wanting additional cruft so it's as if this is the Ben 10 Wikia but actually popular. treelo  radda  22:29, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I've not forgotten about this. I'm getting a headache looking at it, tho. It seems like Ben and the rest of major characters should be on their own article. I'm just pondering the rest, things like List of enemies in Ben 10, and so on. It's just so dreadful. Yngvarr (t) (c) 14:16, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Welcome to my world, Chuckles. Let's face it, series like these will inevitably demand a presence here as rich as the universe it creates (see List of allies and other characters in Codename: Kids Next Door) but as we both know that's stupid fanboi crap. If the split as far as you see it seems like an issue then I'd say to tighten the threshold for inclusion or just use WP:TOONMOS as you could most likely get it below 50Kb that way and then consider what to do about a split but all I know is that one will be required even though if we were gonna be strict we could lower it down to one solo list of non-major primaries with a limit on how much goes in. I can see the headache, where do you split, how do you split, where should certain chararcters go, should certain characters even gain inclusion? Like I say, use the guideline the MOS establishes and try and work out just what sort of list setup would work, just don't let it get fragmented to the level of List of enemies and past allies in Ben 10: Alien Force (season 2). treelo  radda  14:40, 5 April 2009 (UTC)


 * And there we go. I've also placed a request to move over the badly formed redirect. Yngvarr (t) (c) 10:30, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Hm, no loss of data from what I can see, bit of a shame as their inclusion standards are incredibly loose (two appearances are enough) and need a tightening. You realise they fixed that rd bug, right? I've moved it over to the correct title and yes, it should have been announced to a wider audience than the folk who read Wikipedia Signpost. treelo  radda  11:00, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * No, I wasn't aware of the redirect thingy, thanks for telling me. Maybe I should subscribe to the signpost. I'll probably plunk a note on the talk page, just for the sake of process, but also to mention the level of cruft. I'm all twitchy after skimming through that drivel. No wonder I don't even watch this show. Yngvarr (t) (c) 11:07, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Temporary injunction and your use of my monobook script
Hi,

I am pleased to see that you have used my monobook script to remove the autoformatting or linking of dates or other functions; I hope you have found it useful.

This is to let you know that ArbCom has announced a temporary injunction against the "mass delinking of dates". You can still delink dates on an occasional basis; however, you may wish to be cautious and use the script only for its non-date functions until the issue is resolved by an RFC poll. You may wish to express your view on autoformatting and date linking in the RFC at: Date_formatting_and_linking_poll.

Regards Lightmouse (talk) 18:58, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

== Wikipedia Signpost : 13 April 2009 ==


 * License update: Licensing vote begins
 * News and notes: WMF petitions Obama, longer AFDs, UK meeting, and more
 * Dispatches: Let's get serious about plagiarism
 * WikiProject report: WikiProject Color
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 17:11, 13 April 2009 (UTC) == Wikipedia Signpost : 27 April 2009 ==


 * Book reviews: Reviews of Lazy Virtues: Teaching Writing in the Age of Wikipedia
 * News and notes: Usability study, Wiki Loves Art, and more
 * Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia Art dispute, and brief headlines
 * WikiProject report: Interview on WikiProject Final Fantasy
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 05:06, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

== Wikipedia Signpost <span style="color:#666; font-variant: small-caps; font-size:80%; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">: 11 May 2009 ==


 * News and notes: Wikimania 2010, usability project, link rot, and more
 * Wikipedia in the news: Quote hoax replicated in traditional media, and more
 * Dispatches: WikiProject Birds reaches an FA milestone
 * WikiProject report: WikiProject Michael Jackson
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 22:39, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Thx
Thanks for fixing my mistake on ten's talk. Actually, what I intended was, producing ; I just put a : instead of a |. Just FYI, really, and thx.  Chzz  ►  22:47, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

== Wikipedia Signpost <span style="color:#666; font-variant: small-caps; font-size:80%; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">: 18 May 2009 ==


 * From the editor: Writers needed
 * Special report: WikiChemists and Chemical Abstracts announce collaboration
 * Special report: Embassies sponsor article-writing contests in three languages
 * News and notes: Wiki Loves Arts winners, Wikimania Conference Japan, and more
 * Wikipedia in the news: Arbitrator blogs, French government edits, brief headlines
 * WikiProject report: WikiProject Opera
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 13:50, 19 May 2009 (UTC) == Wikipedia Signpost <span style="color:#666; font-variant: small-caps; font-size:80%; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">: 25 May 2009 ==


 * License update: Licensing vote results announced, resolution passed
 * News and notes: New board member, flagged revisions, Eurovision interviews
 * Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia: threat or menace?
 * WikiProject report: WikiProject LGBT studies
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 04:26, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

User: Nextamongs
I left him a level 4 vandalism warning on his talk page. That Mime Trio garbage is so overt that we don't have to go through the steps. If he does it again, report him for vandalism after level 4 warning. Thanks for keeping the faith. 69.236.142.21 (talk) 03:45, 29 May 2009 (UTC) == Wikipedia Signpost <span style="color:#666; font-variant: small-caps; font-size:80%; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">: 1 June 2009 ==


 * From the editor: Browsing the archives
 * Book review: Review of The Future of the Internet
 * Scientology: End of Scientology arbitration brings blocks, media coverage
 * News and notes: Picture of the Year, Wikipedia's first logo, Board elections, and more
 * Wikipedia in the news: Tamil Wikipedia, Internet Watch Foundation, and more
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 23:17, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Abandon hope all ye who enter here
Just went for a browse on Talk:Ed, Edd n Eddy to see if that godforsaken episode had managed to find a source and finally silenced the kids who type in all caps AS THEN THEIR POINT IS MORE RIGHT!!!!1! even if their grammar and spelling remains sub 5th grade. No, if anything it's inflamed them, made them even more prone to hitting caps lock with their chubby pinkies and still doing the circlejerk. It's pathetic in that it doesn't matter if the episode is mentioned, it doesn't matter if it exists to the point you're willing to argue apoplectically just so you get the right to say "nah nah, I'm right and you're wroo-ong" and it really doesn't matter when it becomes so ludicrously petty and whiny you'd rather delete the articles and tell them to fuck off elsewhere if they want teh dramaz. When it has gotten to the point when very few people besides entrenched article owners and fanboi anons want to maintain, something needs to give and why not reduce it back to one article, basic bios for characters and no episode list? It's for the good of the article, not its editors or what few it has left. I'm not saying cut them loose as it's not worth the mind-numbing kiddiefights but in a way that's exactly what I'm saying. treelo <sub style="color:#D2CDC6;">radda  12:35, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
 * WHAT EXACTLY ARE YOU REFERRING TO? Yea, I try to keep my cool there, but it's not easy, am close to pulling a Treelo and abandoning it myself, to be honest. Look at this. WTF? Another fracken rumor from 3eds. I'll look into the whole shitpot and see how it can be moved into a smaller framework. Yngvarr (t) (c) 14:24, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't blame if you decided to redirect a bunch of articles, smerge little of each into the main article and left them to fight over the dead horse remains. How many other subjects you know of get this sort of whackjob contingent making up a large amount of the editorship outside of reality TV series or fringe beliefs? Which reminds me, never ever go anywhere the Total Drama Island/Action carbuncle, it's an odd combination of pure idiot, reality TV statistics for a pure fiction series and cruft. treelo  <sub style="color:#D2CDC6;">radda  14:33, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

== Wikipedia Signpost <span style="color:#666; font-variant: small-caps; font-size:80%; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">: 15 June 2009 ==


 * Book review :Review of Cyberchiefs: Autonomy and Authority in Online Tribes
 * News and notes: License update, Google Translate, GLAM conference, Paid editing
 * Wikipedia in the news: In the Google News, London Review of Books, and more
 * WikiProject report: WikiProject Chemistry
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 12:37, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

== Wikipedia Signpost <span style="color:#666; font-variant: small-caps; font-size:80%; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">: 22 June 2009 ==


 * Special report:Study of vandalism survival times
 * News and notes: Wikizine, video editing, milestones
 * Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia impacts town's reputation, assorted blogging
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:44, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the AIV report of ; he's been indef blocked and I think I've cleared up all his mess. Let me know if I missed anything - cheers! ~ mazca  talk 20:30, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

huh
I didn't know there was a nocoins tag. treelo <sub style="color:#D2CDC6;">radda  20:51, 25 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Seems kind of, well, pointless to me. I mean, coins are generally of a size, small enough fit in pockets and stuff, and easily visualized, be it an American penny or a Euro coin. Not sure there are any coins the size of dinner plates left in circulation. And its only used for relative size comparison, not for precise dimensions. I think we use an abacus that take care of that. Yngvarr (t) (c) 21:09, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * You confuse me like Chowder does, him and his menagerie. Still, they offer sizes anyway so it seems daft to me to chastise the image uploader for using a coin for reference though they are right, a coin is a crummy means to offer a sizing comparison. Abacus... maybe someone used this as a size comparison once. treelo  <sub style="color:#D2CDC6;">radda  00:08, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Now THATS what I'm talking about! Although I wonder if they took into consideration the exchange rates? Wonder how many Canadian feet equal an American foot? Yngvarr (t) (c) 00:15, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 4 Canuck feet to one 'Murrican. treelo  <sub style="color:#D2CDC6;">radda  00:16, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Treasure Island GAR notice
I have conducted a reassessment of the article as part of the GA sweeps process. The article needs some work to meet WP:GAC so has been delisted. You can find details of issues that need addressing at Talk:Treasure Island/GA1. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:15, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

known hoaxer you say?
If you're going to say an article creator might be a known hoaxer then wouldn't it follow to at least create a cursory SPI case so you can find out? OK, so the account is too stale to be of any use but it's worth a shot I feel if you're willing to say it is a sock. Your other accounts (including one recent one) are:
 * (only one edit but it's to add an unsourced claim to another orphan hoax article oddly)
 * (already blocked but worth a shot)

Happy hunting. treelo <sub style="color:#D2CDC6;">radda  12:46, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * You are correct. I didn't bother going thru the motions earlier, since it seems (to me) to be fairly obvious. But I've filed an SPI, Sockpuppet investigations/Ben10AF, and will see how it turns out. Yngvarr (t) (c) 12:56, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Good, I say to file it because you might be able to weed some more out or rather would be able to but personally I reckon little will come of this, the IP data attached to these accounts has been deleted so little to connect anything to. Also, I don't think it's the Nicktoons/Cartoon Network hoaxer, that one is more about made-up games, not TV series. treelo  <sub style="color:#D2CDC6;">radda  15:20, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I know I should look at the case before saying things about it. Anyway, what are you looking to gain from this case? Only one account needs blocking and it's not exactly active. What I might do in your position is actually put the case down as Lyle123 rather than Ben10AF seeing as that isn't the primary account and have asked for a CU to do an uproot and salt, find out what other accounts which aren't listed in the case, block them and then block underlying IP addresses for a period. Given Lyle123 likes to make multiple accounts I can't see a downside besides time spent but he's not a fastmoving vandal so that's only minor. Make SPI cases work to their fullest extent, just limply saying "block this" for something very obvious just lops off the leaves you can see, saying "block this and others like it" can lop the vast majority of leaves off and kill the root for a time as well if it's done right. treelo  <sub style="color:#D2CDC6;">radda  15:46, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

RE: Refernces
None of the other films have refernces. Also, Smurfs Movie has it's own page, and other references can be found on Jonny Quest, Yogi Bear, Tom and Jerry and The Jetsons articles.--Snowman Guy (talk) 05:22, 5 July 2009 (UTC)


 * And the other films exist. You're putting 2012 in there, that is three years away. Do these films even exist in reality? Yngvarr (t) (c) 11:50, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
╟─ Treasury Tag ► directorate ─╢ 21:39, 5 July 2009 (UTC) == Wikipedia Signpost <span style="color:#666; font-variant: small-caps; font-size:80%; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">: 6 July 2009 ==


 * News and notes: Commons grant, license change, new chapters, usability and more
 * Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia and kidnapping, new comedy series
 * WikiProject report: WikiProject Food and Drink
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:55, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

== Wikipedia Signpost <span style="color:#666; font-variant: small-caps; font-size:80%; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">: 27 July 2009 ==


 * From the editor: Welcome to the build-your-own edition of the Signpost
 * Board elections: Board of Trustees elections draw 18 candidates for 3 seats
 * Wiki-Conference: Wikimedians and others gather for Wiki-Conference New York
 * Wikipedia Academy: Volunteers lead Wikipedia Academy at National Institutes of Health
 * News and notes: Things that happened in the Wikimedia world
 * Wikipedia in the news: Assorted news coverage of Wikipedia
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
 * WikiProject report: WikiProject Oregon
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe Delivered by -- <em style="font-family:Kristen ITC;color:#ff0000"> Tinu  <em style="font-family:Kristen ITC;color:#ff0000">Cherian BOT  - 15:18, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Crap
OK, it's the least fun thing to deal with but Ed, Edd n Eddy's Big Picture Show now has an article (apparently badly translated from another wiki or seemingly a forum) and lemme tell ya, it's a pain to read through. Basically following on from other undeserved spinouts for feature length episodes, this needs either redirecting, given a non-fanboi oriented rewrite or plain deleted. Given that though, seems we have work on our hands, I didn't notice this before but over in the fetid cage of KND, every single link on their episode list goes out to the Wikia-based KND wiki. It's been that way ever since 2007 (thank this froot loop for doing it) and it's not really kosher given Wikia's low bar for any form of notability assesment and how each link looks as if it'll keep you on the same server as the list. We need to enlist TTN to try and clear up some of the mess with the feature length episode articles with no notability or sourcing, he does a decent job and is very much anti-cruft and seemingly anti-douchebag fanboi too. So, see what you can do about it, there's a lot to redirect and judiciously smerge. treelo <sub style="color:#D2CDC6;">radda  23:05, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Not worth your time? Meh, it's not worth mine either but I figured it'd give us something to do instead of playing the revert game. Can't very well go bug ol' workaday over there, can we? Say something odd and he shuts up tighter than a really tight thing. treelo  <sub style="color:#D2CDC6;">radda  15:24, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh shit. I did not even see this. Yngvarr (t) (c) 15:30, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm blaming the signpost, damn waste of bits. treelo  <sub style="color:#D2CDC6;">radda  15:52, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * actually you're right, but I didn't wanna play the blame game. But I did unsubscribe cause it's not the first time I've missed something. Yngvarr (t) (c) 15:55, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm fairly happy to play a blame game where blame can be attributed accurately but enough of that, respond to this missed message of woe. treelo  <sub style="color:#D2CDC6;">radda  15:57, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, I looked at the EE&E movie article, and broke out a chainsaw. I also put a note on the talk page. But it looks like one of our friends has tagged it for A1 (no context). While I silently cheer his boldness in that, I don't think A1 would stick, and I think G4 (recreation of AFD deletion) would be more appropriate. Yngvarr (t) (c) 16:03, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, I doubt either would fly personally, the content won't be the same as whatever was there during the AfD and A1 ain't never going to happen. treelo  <sub style="color:#D2CDC6;">radda  16:39, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

(undent) Gonna let it sit for a day or two, and ponder yet another AFD. I'm not willing to do an outright redirect, and I figure an AFD (even given the presumed outcome) will at least allow more "airtime" on this morass. It's not gonna go away, and IMO the only way to get something to "stick" is to show consensus. Yngvarr (t) (c) 21:41, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The only thing that sticks to a wound like this is WP:SALT. I'd say let it sit for a period also as a protected redirect would suit me fine. Anyway, if that's on a low simmer, you might want to check on the KND Wikia link issue which is simply not justifiable and see if you can pass on word to TTN regarding the other "movie" articles we have such as Underfist and Operation: I.N.T.E.R.V.I.E.W.S which need handling. I'd redirect or nom for AfD myself but TTN can do it more efficiently and he has a decent hit rate for deletions. treelo  <sub style="color:#D2CDC6;">radda  22:12, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Are you backseating on me? Seems these other issues I mention here still need handling. Still, you have been gone since yesterday with little to no notification that you might be taking a sojourn elsewhere. Meh, I might get onto TTN myself regarding the dumb film articles which need deleting or merging though he has handled the KND one I mentioned though there is another he'll probably spot soon enough. The Wikia in-line link thing has been fixed but it's also one half hour I'm not going to get back. treelo  <sub style="color:#D2CDC6;">radda  15:16, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * No, not giving you the slip. Just things popped up over the weekend that I wasn't prepared for. Yngvarr (t) (c) 19:11, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I see, well then you might want to do the honours in trying to get TTN into nom'ing those errant film articles for deletion given the other issues are dealt with (and the AfD for the EEnE "movie" stands un!voted on, expect a relist should things not pick up). Also, go bug Chowder, he's been aloof for a few weeks and I think it's time to bring him back into the fold. treelo  <sub style="color:#D2CDC6;">radda  20:48, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

(merp) FYI chucklebutt, when making an AfD regarding something that now exists but use previous AfDs as some form of corroboration for deletion though they don't have relevance directly to the current AfD, don't mention why or link to them if the reason for their deletion doesn't apply to this one. Sometimes people don't read AfD reasons over two sentences long, they drift over and only catch that it hasn't been released and non-notable even though it does say hadn't and also makes issue of the lack of sourcing. Be short, be specific, be succinct. I expect that it might very well be protected after this, it'll be the fifth time. Also, go bug Tenpy some more, we only got one day out of him before he mooched off to protect his twangy noise stuff. treelo <sub style="color:#D2CDC6;">radda  08:49, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

== Wikipedia Signpost <span style="color:#666; font-variant: small-caps; font-size:80%; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">: 3 August 2009 ==


 * News and notes: WMF elections, strategy wiki, museum partnerships, and much more
 * Wikipedia in the news: Dispute over Rorschach test images, and more
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 07:01, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:11, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Oh, the crap you missed...
Well, it's been an eventful few days since your absence, what's been happening.... Oh, Chowder went up for RfA again but got fired down by inclusionists, a dimwit earned his wings again after begging in IRC and not noticing that there's still SEW to piss and shit dumbfuck over and that... is pretty much it, yeah. But still, it all occurred whilst you weren't here! Just don't assume that terrible things happen when you go away. treelo <sub style="color:#D2CDC6;">radda  17:22, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Happy 's Day!
For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day! and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it.<span style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif"> — <b style="color:#060;">Rlevse</b> • Talk  • 00:19, 6 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Heh, I must say I'm flattered as well as surprised. "Just doing my job". Thanks tho :) Yngvarr (t) (c) 09:02, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Ahh, go blow it out your nose, where's my day huh? treelo  <sub style="color:#D2CDC6;">radda  10:24, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 18:36, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:29, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

File:Yng-cat.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Yng-cat.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Skier Dude ( talk ) 04:49, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Yngvarr! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:47, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Ron Erhardt (politician) -

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:07, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:CN Current collaboration
Template:CN Current collaboration has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 22:49, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:21, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:19, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 07:55, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 08:46, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:49, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cartoon Network-Outreach
Template:Cartoon Network-Outreach has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. JJ98 (Talk) 04:06, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

MfD nomination of WikiProject Cartoon Network/Peer review
WikiProject Cartoon Network/Peer review, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Cartoon Network/Peer review and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of WikiProject Cartoon Network/Peer review during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. JJ98 (Talk)  06:20, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of David Stenhouse for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Stenhouse is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/David Stenhouse until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. The-Pope (talk) 12:21, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Acorn-flats.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Acorn-flats.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Paper Luigi Talk • Contributions 00:21, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Camp-Kindey-exit-sign.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Camp-Kindey-exit-sign.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Paper Luigi Talk • Contributions 00:24, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

MfD nomination of WikiProject Animation/Cartoon Network work group/Style guidelines
WikiProject Animation/Cartoon Network work group/Style guidelines, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Animation/Cartoon Network work group/Style guidelines and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of WikiProject Animation/Cartoon Network work group/Style guidelines during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions)  00:53, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

MfD nomination of WikiProject Animation/Cartoon Network work group/Jumpaclass
WikiProject Animation/Cartoon Network work group/Jumpaclass, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Animation/Cartoon Network work group/Jumpaclass and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of WikiProject Animation/Cartoon Network work group/Jumpaclass during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions)  00:55, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

MfD nomination of WikiProject Animation/Cartoon Network work group/Notice board
WikiProject Animation/Cartoon Network work group/Notice board, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Animation/Cartoon Network work group/Notice board and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of WikiProject Animation/Cartoon Network work group/Notice board during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions)  19:03, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

MfD nomination of WikiProject Animation/Cartoon Network work group/Community
WikiProject Animation/Cartoon Network work group/Community, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Animation/Cartoon Network work group/Community and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of WikiProject Animation/Cartoon Network work group/Community during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions)  19:05, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

MfD nomination of WikiProject Animation/Cartoon Network work group/Newsletter
WikiProject Animation/Cartoon Network work group/Newsletter, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Animation/Cartoon Network work group/Newsletter and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of WikiProject Animation/Cartoon Network work group/Newsletter during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions)  19:06, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

MfD nomination of WikiProject Animation/Cartoon Network work group/Newsletter/current
WikiProject Animation/Cartoon Network work group/Newsletter/current, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Animation/Cartoon Network work group/Newsletter/current and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of WikiProject Animation/Cartoon Network work group/Newsletter/current during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions)  04:42, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

MfD nomination of WikiProject Animation/Cartoon Network work group/Watchlist
WikiProject Animation/Cartoon Network work group/Watchlist, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Animation/Cartoon Network work group/Watchlist and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of WikiProject Animation/Cartoon Network work group/Watchlist during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions)  04:45, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:UnsignedAFC
Template:UnsignedAFC has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. <b style="font-family:Courier New; display:inline; border:#009 1px dashed; padding:1px 6px 2px 7px; white-space:nowrap; color:#000000; font-size:smaller;">mabdul</b> 02:21, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:MoonPie logo trademark.png
Thank you for uploading File:MoonPie logo trademark.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Armbrust, B.Ed. <sup style="color:#E3A857;">Let's talk <sub style="color:#008000;">about my edits? 15:27, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

File:MoonPie logo trademark.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MoonPie logo trademark.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Armbrust, B.Ed. <sup style="color:#E3A857;">Let's talk <sub style="color:#008000;">about my edits? 23:15, 11 March 2012 (UTC)