User talk:Ynoss

Welcome to my talk page.
 * Please continue conversations on the same talk page that they started.
 * [ Click here ] to start a new conversation. Thank you!

If I left you a message: please answer on  talk page,. If you leave me a message: I will answer on  talk page,.

Accurate Star Sizes
Could you please stop undoing my edits on List of Largest Stars? Even no ref says that UY Scuti is 2,208.5 solar radii, and stop removing the higher estimates on Westerlund 1-26 and VV Cephei. I am not a vandal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Niyet' (talk • contribs) 20:33, 23 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Sorry but, I don't say that UY Sct is and VV Cep is not thought to be  because the roche lobe of VV Cep A is calculated to be about, so the radius can be no larger than this.  Your edits have been reverted by Lithopsian not by me.


 * And even your edits could be considered disruptive editing which can lead to being blocked. Please only make edits which can be verified in a reliable external source, and give that source. Thank you — ~   Zape rator Ynoss  44 71 ★    ✉  /  Cbs  ~ 21:00, 23 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Yeah, but when I put VV Cephei A at 1,050 - 1,900, I made it smaller than VY Canis Majoris. So I never gave it the higher estiamte. And you do make UY Scuti 2,200 solar radii. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Niyet' (talk • contribs) 21:07, 23 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Stop, I don't say that UY Sct is, I know that UY Scuti is only . Thank you — ~   Zaperator Ynoss Pro   44 71 ★     ✉  /  CONTRIBS  ~ 05:51, 24 June 2017 (UTC)


 * https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_d%27%C3%A9toiles_par_taille_d%C3%A9croissante <- UY Scuti size exaggeration — Preceding unsigned comment added by Niyet' (talk • contribs) 19:29, 24 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Stop hand nuvola.svg For the third time, I don't say that UY Scuti is ! Please, Stop it! This is 2a01:e35:8bcd:7270:3cce:5df0:c854:3c48 that makes UY Scuti . This could be a possible personal attack. If you continue to accuse me, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you — ~   Zape rator YnossPro  44 71 ★    ✉  /  CONTRIBS  ~ 19:44, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Shitty person
You really dont deserve to be banned, you are a great person! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.13.130.94 (talk) 20:28, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

I agree with 187.13.130.94, you are a great person. After all, you are Space Infinite's friend, not his sockpuppet. --Joey P. - THE OFFICIAL (talk) 03:29, 20 August 2017 (UTC) (Talk/Contributions)

Draft:V396 Centauri concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:V396 Centauri, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:V396 Centauri


Hello, Ynoss. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "V396 Centauri".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 18:01, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Caelum Supercluster


The article Caelum Supercluster has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No significant coverage, not a particularly notable supercluster, and the figure for its size is unsourced and most likely spurious."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SkyFlubbler (talk) 13:50, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Caelum Supercluster for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Caelum Supercluster is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Caelum Supercluster until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. SkyFlubbler (talk) 02:45, 9 January 2023 (UTC)