User talk:YoMamma202

Welcome to Wikipedia
--4wajzkd02 (talk) 06:27, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Warnings
 Note: Always remember to substitute user warning templates. For help on user warnings, see the WikiProject on User Warnings. Older warnings may have been removed, but are still visible in the [ page history]. [Admin: block | [ unblock] / Info: contribs | [ page moves] | [ block log] | [ block list]]

November 2009
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because "YoMamma" may be considered offensive.. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may file for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account and use that for editing. Thank you. fetchcomms 03:15, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Im using it in a more comedic way to make people laugh when they see my user name.YoMamma202 (talk) 20:37, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devils Racecourse. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the [ page history]. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ~Super Hamster  Talk Contribs 04:50, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devils Racecourse. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Dr.K.praxislogos 04:55, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devils Racecourse, you will be blocked from editing. Dr.K.praxislogos 04:56, 7 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Please do not remove Afd tags from articles, as you did to Devils Racecourse. Based on your comment on the article's talk page, I assume you wanted to close the deletion nomination. However, when an article is placed for deletion, the discussion should stay up until consensus has been met. If you would like, you can participate in the nomination by placing your input here, but please do not blank the page. Please see this page for more info on articles for deletion, and this page for the notability guidelines for films. Thanks, ~Super Hamster  Talk Contribs 04:57, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. --4wajzkd02 (talk) 06:43, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/TheInformant09 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Dr.K.praxislogos 06:50, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
 * WP:SOCK confirmed. --4wajzkd02 (talk) 16:01, 7 November 2009 (UTC)