User talk:Yocasta

Your submission at Articles for creation
Thank you for submitting an article at Articles for Creation. Your submission has been reviewed and has been put on hold pending clarification or improvements from you or other editors. Please take a look and respond if possible. If there is no response within twenty-four hours the request may be declined; if this happens feel free to continue to work on the article and resubmit when you believe the concerns have been addressed. Thank you. Raven1977 Talk to me My edits 22:57, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 16:47, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Marion Adinolfi
I assume you're talking about this: Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Marion_D._Adinolfi. Another reviewer declined it when you didn't change what I requested in the comments at the top of the text of the article. If you can make the fixes I mentioned in my comments though, we'll review the article further, as long as you put the following at the top of the article: (If you don't place that tag, it stays in the declined section, and won't get looked at again. As for the fixes, I mentioned them in at the top of the article. But to expand on those comments: firstly the article needs more secondary reliable sources, as it stands there are too many sources directly associated with the subject. The article also needs direct citations for the claims of awards and achievements; the list of references is not enough, we need to know what references back up what claims. The best way to do that is by using footnotes, which you can see explained here: CITE. Once you have fixed these things, add the tag I mentioned above, which will put the article back in the "pending review" queue; and one of the reviewers will re-review the article. Raven1977 Talk to me My edits 17:21, 15 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The submission is back on hold again, though to make conversation easier, I've moved it to Articles for creation/Marion D. Adinolfi, and all issues that need to be addressed can be found on the talk page of the submission. Please thoroughly review those comments that are on that talk page, as they still mention the basic reasons for the hold, and how to improve the article submission. You can also use that talk page to respond to comments or make comments or ask questions of the reviewers. Raven1977 Talk to me My edits  01:31, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi again. I moved your recent question regarding this submission to the talk page of the submission, and I replied there. There are more reviewers at AFC than just me, so I think it's best to keep the discussion there so they can make comments too. Please, feel free to post any further comments or questions at that link. Thanks, Raven1977 Talk to me My edits  19:40, 21 April 2009 (UTC)