User talk:Yodanyrd

Welcome from Wtwilson3
Your edit was not incomprehensible and was reverted.



Savvyjack23 (talk) — is wishing you a Happy New Year! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:New Year 1}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Savvyjack23 (talk) 07:57, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

January 2016
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Dominican Republic, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.  General Ization  Talk   19:48, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to People of the Dominican Republic. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  General Ization  Talk   19:57, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

This is your final warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Black Hispanic and Latino Americans with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jim1138 (talk) 02:04, 4 January 2016 (UTC) You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 11:45, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Genetics in the DR
Please, cease disruptive editing. Refer to the article's Talk page and discuss the matter there before attempting to include any new information about genetics in the DR. Caballero /  Historiador ⎌  23:52, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Continued unsourced and non-neutral edits
Yodanyrd, I've notice that some of your recent edits don't seem to adhere to our neutral point of view policy. In addition, you uploaded this image: File:Occupation of Santo Domingo.png claiming it is your "own work" when it obviously is not, and naming it "Occupation of Santo Domingo" when it is taken from a book published almost ten years before that, about massacres in Saint-Domingue, not Santo Domingo.

I'm especially concerned about a previous edit:, where you copypasted material, without attribution, from the Puerto Ricans article at the time: , and just replaced "Puerto Ricans" with "Dominicans". You removed the citations about Puerto Rico, and changed a couple of the facts without any sources. Aside from the copyright problems (see WP:COPYWITHIN), the content obviously applies to Puerto Ricans, not Dominicans - in other words, you knowingly added false information. Please consider this your final final warning, and ensure that your edits adhere to all the core content and copyright policies in the future, or you may be blocked from editing without any further warning. --IamNotU (talk) 00:54, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

September 2020
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Afro-Dominicans. ''Deleting information supported by a reliable published source as you did in this edit: because you personally disagree with it violates the neutral point of view policy. Wikipedia does not take sides, but explains the sides, without bias.'' IamNotU (talk) 15:15, 8 September 2020 (UTC)