User talk:Yodavadisquo

Nomination of Sunil Kalda for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sunil Kalda is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sunil Kalda until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Daiyusha (talk) 15:36, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

November 2018
There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. 331dot (talk) 11:52, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

I made this block due to this report stating the fact that your username is that of a website, which is not permitted. 331dot (talk) 03:33, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

You emailed me claiming I blocked you. This is not the case. Your block log is available here and shows I was not involved. If you wish to be unblocked, please read WP:GAB. --Yamla (talk) 15:22, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

To be unblocked, you need to make a successful unblock request that addresses the reason for the block; for guidance, please read the page Yamla links to above. Please do not email me further about this matter. 331dot (talk) 15:56, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

request for unblock
"I plead ignorance and innocence to any misconduct whatsoever in any capacity" So you are saying you are not aware of anything you've done wrong and haven't done anything wrong? That's grounds to leave the block in place. --Yamla (talk) 13:10, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
 * (responding to email) I do indeed think your unblock request would be more likely to be successful without that line. I think you intend that line to mean something different than most readers will believe it means. To any reviewing admin who gets here before Scribbleyard comes back, consider ignoring that line in the unblock request. --Yamla (talk) 13:50, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

re: unblock request

 * I have globally renamed Scribbleyard to Yodavadisquo, and someone else will review your unblock request. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:29, 15 December 2018 (UTC)