User talk:Yoddha1

Ramdev
Hi thanks for your interest in editing Wikipedia. I have reverted your recent edit since I did not feel like it adhered to Wikipedia's policy of maintaining a neutral point of view. Please read the guidelines on the policy page I linked to and feel free to add the material again from a neutral perspective. I hope you hang around and continue making Wikipedia a better place. Cheers! Bubka42 (talk) 16:26, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

August 2020
Hello, I'm Tayi Arajakate. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tayi Arajakate Talk 04:13, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

September 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Nirmala Sitharaman, you may be blocked from editing.    Pro lix 💬 07:44, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at David Frawley.    Pro lix 💬 08:32, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Guo Huaiyi rebellion, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.    Pro lix 💬 06:00, 7 September 2020 (UTC)