User talk:Yodhheya56

October 2021
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Ramayana. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox.   WikiLinuz  ( talk ) 13:35, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Yodhheya56, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. OhNo itsJamie Talk 19:42, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

How can you say that i have made any disruptive editing. Bhatias are descendants of bhati rajputs and i have completely backed that by relevant sources. On what grounds you have discarded? Thats quiet disturbing. Yodhheya56 (talk) 19:51, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 21:49, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I've blocked your other active sock as well .-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 21:49, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Bhatia rajputs
This is unethical and not acceptable that you have permanently blocked me. It seems you people do not want to entertain the real history. I made edits but with proper references then even you blocked me permanently. What kind of attitude is this. I sincerely request you to unblock me as i would never make any edit without reliable reference. Yodhheya56 (talk) 06:38, 8 December 2021 (UTC)