User talk:Yofoxyman

Welcome to Wikipedia. While I appreciate your attempts to weed out non-notable people, please do not deface pages to prove a point. If you persist, you may be blocked from editing. Johnleemk | Talk 17:23, 22 April 2006 (UTC)


 * There is no other word for removing others' comments. Whatever you may think of someone, it is not civil at all to edit or remove his/her comments, let alone the comments of someone totally uninvolved in the dispute. This is vandalism. Johnleemk | Talk 18:43, 22 April 2006 (UTC)


 * I don't care if you continue to deny the truth. Just don't do it again. Johnleemk | Talk 19:03, 22 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Obviously you have not bothered to clink this link which I have given you three times. I also really ought to remind you of our civility policy. You are skating on thin ice. Johnleemk | Talk 19:10, 22 April 2006 (UTC)


 * If you want an admin's attention, just ask. Don't vandalise. Have I made myself clear? Johnleemk | Talk 19:39, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

please sign your posts
Remember always to sign all of your posts on talk pages. Typing four tildes after your comment ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) will insert a signature showing your username and a date/time stamp, which is very helpful. Thanks, -- stillnotelf   is invisible  19:50, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

WP:NPA and WP:CIVIL
In regard to edits like this one, please read WP:NPA and WP:CIVIL. Personal attacks on other editors are never acceptable. JoshuaZ 21:36, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

Contributions
Taking a look at this users contributions, i've noticed he has only vandalised and made personal attacks. he has yet to make one useful contribution. going to keep an eye out oh him now. Chinamanjoe 00:13, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Please do not make personal attacks on other people. Wikipedia has a policy against personal attacks. In some cases, users who engage in personal attacks may be blocked from editing by admins or banned by the arbitration committee. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please resolve disputes appropriately. Thank you. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chinamanjoe (talk • contribs) 00:36, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Please do not make personal attacks on other people. Wikipedia has a policy against personal attacks. In some cases, users who engage in personal attacks may be blocked from editing by admins or banned by the arbitration committee. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please resolve disputes appropriately. Thank you. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chinamanjoe (talk • contribs) 00:36, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Regarding edits such as this: You have been temporarily blocked from editing for disrupting Wikipedia by making personal attacks. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. --InShaneee 01:50, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Regarding edits such as : I would appreciate if you would stop making up lies about me. That is a form of personal attack, which you have already been blocked for. I have asked you nicely. I do not want to have to ask again. Please stop. Thank you. Chinamanjoe 01:19, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Regarding this edit and others: this IS considered a personal attack. Keep your comments to article content and refrain from discussing other users or you will be blocked again. --InShaneee 01:21, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Regarding this edit: This is your last warning. Stop making accusations of other users or you will be blocked. --InShaneee 02:39, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * they would be accusations if they had no factual background. however my claims do. and there is tons of proof if you just search up the history for discussion pages of Justin Besant, Annie Besant, The Cortez Trio to name a few as examples Yofoxyman 02:42, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * It's an accusation whether it's true or not, and it's innapropriate to make them. This is not up for discussion; if you continue talking about other users in such an uncivil manner, you will be blocked. --InShaneee 02:46, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * That's the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard. Let's say you had an important point to discuss about an article and so you posted on the discussion page. Wouldn't you think it's weird/annoying/uncalled for/rude for someone to just go in and delete your discussion items. And what if this happened to you about 20 times in one day? Yofoxyman 02:50, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * If that happens, you discuss the deleted contributions and, if need be, ask an administrator POLITELY to look into the matter. There is NO excuse for making accusations and insults twords another user as you have and continue to, and it will not be tolerated. --InShaneee 02:54, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I had done actions like those a long time ago. But after you post about it and report it and for the 50th time someone tells you that if you have a problem you should go take it up on that discussion page you get a bit fed up that people seriously aren't listening. Yofoxyman 02:55, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * It doesn't matter. There is NO excuse for personal attacks and incivility. --InShaneee 02:59, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Those aren't personal attacks, they are warnings, and they should be taken seriously. Your behavior has already gotten you blocked once, and it will happen again if you continually refuse to act in a civil and respectful manner towords all other editors. --InShaneee 03:03, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * If all the cops are out working then who's policing the police. Yeah, I went there. I think you need to take a step back and look in the mirror. Just because you are admin on this site does not give you the authority to become a hypocrite. If the leaders and delagators are corrupt, who will we look to to set an example, and what will become of society? Well I'm looking at it now, and it's not pretty. The playing field needs to be levelled, and positions should be given out to those who are deserving, and not to those who work their way up and then once they get it throw away all they previously belived in. I'm disgusted. Yofoxyman 03:09, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * You have been blocked for 48 hours for your continued unwillingness to respect any wikipedia policies. You began harrassing chinamanjoe the moment your previous block expired, and since then you have yet to make one useful contribution to the encyclopedia. If you continue to act like a troll when your block expires, you will be blocked again without warning. --InShaneee 03:12, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * see my previous posts as an answer to yours, i'm not gonna waste my time typing them again Yofoxyman 03:18, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Reviewed, seen your previous posts and your unwillingness to behave in a civil manner despite many warnings. Unblock denied. --pgk( talk ) 07:01, 25 April 2006 (UTC)