User talk:Yogeswara bharata

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mita Nag (January 28)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 331dot was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mita Nag and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Mita_Nag Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:331dot&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Mita_Nag reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

331dot (talk) 09:15, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

I don't communicate about most Wikipedia matters via email. I will say that if the only sources are the person and their family, they will not merit a Wikipedia article at this time. An article must summarize published independent reliable sources that can be verified. The person and their family are not independent sources about themselves, and we cannot verify someone's personal comments. 331dot (talk) 13:21, 28 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Thank you. I am learning a lot. I understand your statement, i just dont understand how such a recognized artist can't have its page here. So many sources i see on other classical musicians on Wikipedia are only themselves speaking in an interview... but that is likely recognized as ”reliable source”. That is the point i don't understand, even after reading well the Wikipedia articles about that matter. Mita Nag have appeared in papers of course, but these are paying ones. Maybe they will become free archives some days, but who knows when? I am passionate about music, and i see so often mistakes, wrong sources or even not existing pages that i decided to participate to Wikipedia. I am glad you have answered, even though more i discover, more disappointment come regarding how it functions in reality. Yogeswara bharata (talk) 09:17, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
 * As a simple exemple among many, one page with only 1 source (and the link is dead), but still published with many unsourced details : Kushal Das Yogeswara bharata (talk) 09:51, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Interviews are by definition the person speaking about themselves- that is not an independent source.
 * Sources do not need to be free or easy to access in order to be used on Wikipedia. See WP:PAYWALL. They don't even need to be online(though that helps).
 * As this is a volunteer project where people do what they can when they can, it is possible for inapprpopriate articles to get by us and go unaddressed, even for years. We can only address what we know about.  There are millions of articles and perhaps only tens of thousands of regular editors- we need help in addressing all the problematic articles.  Because of this, the fact that other poor articles exist cannot justify the addition of other inappropriate articles, otherwise nothing could ever be removed from Wikipedia. The article you mention is already marked as problematic.  If you want to use other articles as a model, use those classified as good articles, which have been checked by the community.
 * We don't need the whole url when linking to another Wikipedia article or page, simply place the title of the target in double brackets like this: Joe Biden appears as Joe Biden. This keeps pages cleaner and avoids locking readers into a version of Wikipedia that may not be their preferred version(mobile or desktop) 331dot (talk) 10:35, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much! Very helpful. Yogeswara bharata (talk) 12:17, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Mita Nag
Hello, Yogeswara bharata. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mita Nag, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:05, 29 June 2024 (UTC)