User talk:Yomaco

December 2023
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Paul Stanley (album), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Rusty4321 talk contribs 02:46, 13 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Paul Stanley album was part of the KISS contract. It is a KISS album.  This is well known. Yomaco (talk) 03:21, 13 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The media universally call these four albums "solo" albums. Wikipedia is based on WP:SECONDARY sources. Binksternet (talk) 03:29, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
 * You've been warned repeatedly. Please stop. Philipnelson99 (talk) 04:25, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Philipnelson99. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Paul Stanley (album)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Philipnelson99 (talk) 04:18, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Peter Criss (album). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Philipnelson99 (talk) 04:18, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ace Frehley (album), you may be blocked from editing. Philipnelson99 (talk) 04:20, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Gene Simmons (album). Philipnelson99 (talk) 04:23, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Kiss (band). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Untamed1910 (talk) 04:42, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Your recent editing history at Gene Simmons (album) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Untamed1910 (talk) 04:44, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Daniel Case (talk) 05:27, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Kiss (band). ''You were just blocked for disruptive editing. It is quite clear that you didn't learn why you were blocked. If you continue to edit war on the band's status which is clearly "was", you are at risk of losing your editing privileges again. Cease your disruptive behavior.'' HorrorLover555 (talk) 03:29, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:55, 24 December 2023 (UTC)