User talk:Yorapa

October 2021
Hello Yorapa. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Yorapa. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. David Gerard (talk) 19:05, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Reply: I AM NOT PAID BY ANYONE TO CONTRIBUTE TO WIKIPEDIA. Yorapa (talk) 10:30, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

VOX
I notice you are changing the descriptor of Vox (political party) to "conservative" with an edit summary "Correcting political definition of Vox to what they claim themselves", however, the 'political definitions' being changed are supported by that article. ~ cygnis insignis 04:54, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Reply: That a left-wing publication dismissively calls a party "far-right" doesn't make it so. If you read Vox's platform, it's just a standard conservative platform. They belong to the European Conservatives and Reformists group in the European Parliament. They are the third largest party in the Spanish Parliament and nothing they have done in their comparatively short life qualifies them as "far-right." It is, rather, a disqualifying political tactic used by some, but the truth is that Vox are not considered "untouchables" (like other European parties called "far right") and they are sustaining the government in two of the largest regions in Spain at present. They receive monetary support from the Spanish State (like most major political parties) and even have their own think-tank. Far-right, they are not. Yorapa (talk) 14:07, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

January 2022
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pablo Kleinman. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. NoonIcarus (talk) 15:37, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

September 2023
Hello, I'm Skipple. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Pablo Kleinman—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks.  - Skipple  ☎  02:47, 1 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Totally unwarranted revert. Please do your research before vandalizing others' contributions. Yorapa (talk) Yorapa (talk) 02:57, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Apologies for that. I don't believe I actually intended to revert your edit and may have bumped the revert button by accident.  - Skipple   ☎  03:02, 1 October 2023 (UTC)