User talk:Yorkerman

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for vandalism despite warnings. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Tonywalton Talk 00:00, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Having reviewed your "contributions" in more detail I conclude that you have never made an edit that can be said to enhance the encyclopædia; your edits are purely vandalism. Accordingly:

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Tonywalton Talk 00:05, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Page blanking
Per WP:BLANKING you are not to remove notices of active sanctions on your account. Continued blanking or the inappropriate use of your talk page while blocked will likely result in the removal of your ability to edit this page. --Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 20:28, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

This blocked user ( [ block log] | [ active blocks] | autoblocks | [ unblock] | contribs | deleted contribs | [ abuse log] ) has had their talk page access revoked because an administrator has identified this user's talkpage edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. If you would like to make further requests, you may contact the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-appeals-en@lists.wikimedia.org. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 20:56, 23 May 2013 (UTC)