User talk:Yossishani

Welcome!
Hello Yossishani and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see: If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write   below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia: I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome!
 * Policy on neutral point of view
 * Guideline on spam
 * Guideline on external links
 * Guideline on conflict of interest
 * FAQ for Organizations
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and how to develop articles
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * Article wizard for creating new articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Speedy deletion nomination of PrimeQue


A tag has been placed on PrimeQue requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 23:30, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

February 2013
Please do not use Wikipedia to promote businesses. Wikipedia is not the "Yellow Pages". If you want to list a company for potential customers to find, please consider alternative outlets. Thank you. ''All your edits so far have been to promote a particular business. Continuing in this manner is likely to lead to your being blocked from editing'' Fiddle Faddle (talk) 23:34, 3 February 2013 (UTC)


 * You asked elsewhere on a talk page that is about tp be deleted what you are doing incorrectly. The answer is two thing. First you are adding spam links to and articles about a non notable corporation, and doing it so slowly that you think you have fooled folk into accepting the spam links. The second thing is that you think no-one has noticed. Your edits mean that your account passes the duck test as a single purpose account for the promotion of PrimeQue. Stop spamming and you may enjoy editing Wikipedia. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 00:06, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Yossishani. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may need to consider our guidance on conflicts of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. ''http://primeque.com/about shows you as the CEO of the organisation you are trying to promote. Wikipedia is not your brochure, nor a way to seek recognition of your products, nor to establish your corporation;s notability'' Fiddle Faddle (talk) 00:16, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. 5 albert square (talk) 00:43, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Your desire to add value to the technology area here
You contacted me by email to ask where you had gone astray when you introduced PrimeQue to Wikipedia. I shall not (and may not) reproduce your message here, but I may refer to it and answer it.

Quite reasonably, you wish to increase the sum of public knowledge and add new technology to the encyclopaedia. So do we all. Despite my asking that the article on PrimeQue be torn down, I believe that it deserves an article here, but only if it passes notability criteria and only of that is verifiable in what are termed reliable sources. As the article stood it did not.

Because you are CEO of PrimeQue and a founder, you are proud of your corporation. So you should be. You should promote it everywhere you can, and generate a world class business. I hope the concept is so market acceptable you and your colleagues become inordinately wealthy. The problem you face is that you may absolutely not use Wikipedia to promote your organisation, and, so far, you have. Indeed the only edits you have made to Wikipedia are to enter details about your corporation.

You mention other organisations who are referred to, and seek to use them as an example that allows PrimeQue to be featured here. That argument is invalid here. If those organisations are notable they may remain, if not then someone will prune information about them. It may be today, tomorrow or next year, but the information will go.

You may, as it says in the block notice, something imposed by an administrator on his or her own judgment, appeal the notice and, when successful, continue to edit here. If you do that I suggest most strongly that you commit to avoiding your own corporation in any edits that you make, and demonstrate in your appeal that you understand with precision why you have been blocked and commit to avoid anything that might lead to accusations of conflict of interest or of spamming in the future. However you need to be aware that your work to date passes the duck test of being spam. You need to address that not just in your appeal but in your editing behaviour when you are successful. Wikipedia editors take matters like this very seriously indeed.

I appreciate the assurances you have given me in your email. I have no ability myself to review your block. I am not an administrator here. I have the same status as any editor from the most to the least experienced. Only administrators carry a mop and bucket. They are our janitors, not our managers.

So make your case and appeal your block. WIth PrimeQue, if it is truly notable, then someone will write an article about it, and probably a better one than those involved with it can write. If it is in the startup phase then please trust me, it is not yet notable. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 08:58, 4 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Regarding PrimeQue itself, this search produces nothing notable at all and this one produces a lot of French articles. I submit that your corporation is not, yet, notable. Give it time and rely on others to create an article on it. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 09:16, 4 February 2013 (UTC)