User talk:Yotamabramson

Welcome
Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   and your question on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style

Since you've alreayd entered an arcticle on someone close to you, let me also suggest to
 * Study in particular the guidelines on
 * Notability
 * Autobiography,
 * Conflict of interest. This doesn't mean that you ecesarily have a bias, but keep in mind that whatever happens to 'your' page in wikipedia may cause you stress.
 * Study and maybe edit other articles, e.g on sculptors
 * Remove your e-mail message from Talk:Matanya Abramson to avoid spam. (Rather use the preferences tab to set e-mail settings). Tikiwont 15:03, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Itamar Simonson.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Itamar Simonson.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- Fences &amp;  Windows  20:28, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Paradigm Geophysical
I've moved your article to Draft:Paradigm Geophysical where you can work on it until it's ready for publication. A publicly quoted company ought to be notable but the article doesn't show that it is, or was. We need reliable, verifiable, independent sources to show that it meets the threshold described in WP:NCORP. Hope that helps, Cabayi (talk) 10:40, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

The company was sold for $1B: https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/business/paradigm-is-sold-to-apax-and-jmi-for-1-billion-1.5177501 So it seems like notable (unless the threshold is above $1 billion, in which case why Waze is listed). It was reported on the NY times, a reliable, verifiable and independant source for sure: https://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/06/11/apax-led-group-to-buy-paradigm-for-1-billion/ Thank you

Draft:Paradigm Geophysical


Hello, Yotamabramson. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Paradigm Geophysical.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 01:00, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

Adding trivia to articles
I'll tell you what I told you when you were editing logged out: Wikipedia's rules on this are here. You are free to dispute this rule, which has existed for 18 years, by asking at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Trivia sections. 81.187.192.168 (talk) 15:15, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.81.187.192.168 (talk) 15:19, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

Consensus
Hi Yotamabramson. I didn't mention this at Talk:Buccaneer because it's more for your information, but Wikipedia discussions generally operate on a BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. That means (a) you made a bold edit, (b) someone reverted you, and (c) it's now up to you to build a consensus to support your edit. The burden for adding or restoring content lies with you. It's not up to other editors to convince you otherwise.

It looks like you've been editing here for 17 years, but with 31 edits, you're still considered a new user. I suggest reading through the information left in the Welcome message at the top of this page. Please let me know if you have any questions. Cheers! Woodroar (talk) 16:00, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

ANI post
You are free to repost your comments to ANI, however please do not include a telephone number or other identifiable information. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:27, 6 February 2024 (UTC)