User talk:You've gone incognito

Block Z
Please update your information with the official trailer and official poster Please upload the poster on the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.200.71.18 (talk) 08:55, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

The premise: https://starcinema.abs-cbn.com/movies/block-z — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.28.238.207 (talk) 02:09, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!
 Happy Birthday! Have a very happy birthday on your special day!

Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:23, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

The Getaway (1972 film)
Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article The Getaway has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

The article was in excellent shape and really did not need much done to it.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 14:53, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

Dragons Forever
Hi,

You reverted edits I made.

What source are you referring to?
 * The one I cited in the article: The Hong Kong Filmography, 1977-1997: A Reference Guide to 1,100 Films by John Charles  You've gone incognito  (talk &sdot; contribs) 04:12, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

March 2020
Your recent editing history at The Hunt (2020 film) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

You are stonewalling, removing sourced information, ignoring the fact that several editors agreed with my edit, by improving it rather than reverting. You seem to have an unhealthy WP:OWN issue on this article, and are hereby warned yourself. Debresser (talk) 13:02, 15 March 2020 (UTC)


 * I propose to take this to DRN. What do you say? Debresser (talk) 13:06, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I've struck your template warning as it's asinine and illustrates your lack of knowledge of this site's policies. In any case, I've given you my permission to initiate a dispute resolution discussion in your talk.  You've gone incognito  (talk &sdot; contribs) 13:52, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

In continuation of what we both wrote at WP:DRN. From what you write it seems that you disagree with calling the film a "horror thriller". Well, so do I. My edit says "variously described as a horror or thriller". From what you write, I don't see that you would disagree with this. Please explain. Debresser (talk) 14:25, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I already told you a million times that only the primary genre should be included in the opening sentence of a film article; writing "variously described as a horror or thriller" is disorienting and not exactly informative. The reason it's classified as a "thriller" is because IT'S BEEN PRIMARILY CLASSIFIED BY SOURCES IN SUBGENRES OF THRILLER. Do I need to repeat myself all over again, or should my reply be written in simple English? Quite frankly, I'm appalled by your behaviour to this article, and I don't wish to collaborate with you anytime soon. Besides, I've already filed an ANI report against you, so I just let the admin sort this one out.  You've gone incognito  (talk &sdot; contribs) 14:50, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Admins won't sort out the content issue.
 * How is describing the film as a thriller more informative than presenting the facts as they are. If something is sometimes described as X and sometimes as Y, then what we always do on Wikipedia, and what we should do, is to say precisely that. That is called being informative. Not mentioning one of them, is the opposite of informative.
 * We have a lot of sources that say "horror", enough to substantiate the claim that that is no less primary than thriller.
 * You are very WP:OWN about this, to the detriment of this project. I think you should take a step back, and let the sources speak for themselves. Debresser (talk) 15:01, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for contravening Wikipedia's harassment policy. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 21:46, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

unblock discussion
Link to relevant ANI thread -- Deep fried okra  User talk:Deepfriedokra 20:09, 13 May 2020 (UTC) Need more information on the socking. -- Deep fried okra  User talk:Deepfriedokra 20:09, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

UTRS Appeal
Due to an issue with the UTRS system, your appeal may not have been filed correctly and your appeal key may not work properly. If you still wish to appeal, please file again. -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 05:33, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Song of Bernadette film poster.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The Song of Bernadette film poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:39, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

WikiProject Horror Newsletter - June 2020
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:45, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

WikiProject Horror Newsletter - July 2020
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:27, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Taken 3 OST.jpg


The file File:Taken 3 OST.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-free album cover being used in a decorative manner in Taken 3. Non-free album cover art is generally allowed to be used for primary identification purposes in stand-alone articles about albums, but its use in other articles is generally only allowed when the cover art itself is the subject of sourced critical commentary as explained in WP:NFC and the context for non-free use required by WP:NFCC is evident. There is no such commentary for this particular album cover anywhere in the article, and the use of soundtrack album cover art in articles about films or TV programs is generally not allowed for this reason as explained in WP:FILMSCORE and MOS:TVPRODUCTION."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:29, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Join the Months of African Cinema Global Contest!
Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Orphaned non-free image File:Chiara Badano in 1987.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Chiara Badano in 1987.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

The Months of African Cinema Contest Continues in November!
You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Orphaned non-free image File:March for Life logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:March for Life logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:49, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dummies logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Dummies logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Lino Brocka B&#38;W.PNG listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lino Brocka B&, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:40, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

Welcome to the Months of African Cinema Global Contest!
Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

The Months of African Cinema Contest Continues in November!
You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Orphaned non-free image File:The Fate of The Furious Theatrical Poster.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The Fate of The Furious Theatrical Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:33, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

TFA
Thank you for On the Job (2013 film), introduced (in 2017): "This article is about On the Job, a Philippine crime thriller movie with a couple of chases, gunshots here and there, a serving of sex, and a simple yet intriguing premise: two prison inmates find renewed value and sense of purpose as assassins hired by powerful political forces—until one botched assignment turns their world upside down. Fun stuff!"! - What I read about your career here is no fun, that's sad. Thank you for what you did in happier days! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:28, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Vince and Kath and James OST.jpg


The file File:Vince and Kath and James OST.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-free album cover being used in a decorative manner in Vince and Kath and James. Non-free album cover art is generally allowed to be used for primary identification purposes in stand-alone articles about albums, but its use in other articles is generally only allowed when the cover art itself is the subject of sourced critical commentary as explained in WP:NFC and the context for non-free use required by WP:NFCC is evident. There is no such commentary for this particular album cover anywhere in the article, and the use of soundtrack album cover art in articles about films or TV programs is generally not allowed for this reason as explained in WP:FILMSCORE and MOS:TVPRODUCTION."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:10, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:14, 2 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Oh, my -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:22, 2 July 2023 (UTC)