User talk:YouHadTime

You're 1) Editing a poorly-named article (We moved it elsewhere a long time ago) so all you're doing is breaking a valid redirect, and 2) That "banner" makes no sense and has no place anywhere in the article, particularly at the top. Do not term my repair of your incorrect edit as vandalism. --Golbez 04:29, 14 December 2006 (UTC)


 * When you basically blank an entire article, that's considered vandalism here at Wikipedia. --YouHadTime 04:47, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Please stop "reverting vandalism" at September 11 attacks. The article exists at a different name, September 11, 2001 attacks and that page is supposed to redirect there. Blanking an article and replacing it with a redirect is not vandalism if said redirect leads to the same article at a better name – Gurch 04:51, 14 December 2006 (UTC)


 * You're redirecting the article to the Whitehouse press release. That is basically the same as blanking an artilce and therefore vandalism. --YouHadTime 04:53, 14 December 2006 (UTC)


 * No, I redirected it to our article. I don't know if you're trying to be funny, but you're not succeeding. If you genuinely believe there is a problem with the target article, bring it up on the article's talk page, rather that attempting to make a point elsewhere. You are likely to be indefinitely blocked if you continue – Gurch 04:57, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

re September 11 attacks
What on earth are you up to? There is an article called September 11, 2001 attacks. Edits should be made there. Other names for the same thing that readers might type in (such as September 11 attacks, 9/11, and so forth) are redirects - they all take the reader automatically to the article September 11, 2001 attacks. It would be chaos if we had separate articles under each name. If you think the main article should have a different name, you may make a case for that at the talk page of September 11, 2001 attacks. If you have any questions about any of this, message me. Herostratus 04:57, 14 December 2006 (UTC)