User talk:You Can Act Like A Man/Archive 2

Please comment on Talk:Buchenwald Trial
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Buchenwald Trial. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 01:15, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:History of Vojvodina
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:History of Vojvodina. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 03:15, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:John Kerry military service controversy
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:John Kerry military service controversy. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 05:15, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ford
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ford. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 07:15, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Thank you!!! for adding "Major Edit" tag on "Impalement"!!
I ceratainly prefer to be "alone" about restructuring of article here; thought about doing this prior to GA nomination, on basis of short thrift there, have decided to comprise article in major way to make it more readable to less ghoulish readers than myself. :-)Arildnordby (talk) 16:36, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Allah Las article rejection
The article I submitted for review about the Allah Las was rejected for not having references that proved its noteworthiness (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Allah_Las).

Among other sources, the article referenced: 1. NPR's national website 2. LA Weekly, a major LA news and events periodical 3. Amoeba Music's website, one of the largest (if not the largest) independent record stores in the Unites States that is also known as an arbiter of up and coming musical acts

The references in the Allah Las article seem every bit as strong as the sources cited in this article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Growlers

Can you please clarify?

Jeffrey.stottlemyer (talk) 17:28, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ahbashism campaign
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ahbashism campaign. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 09:15, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

YuMe
Hi,

You reviewed my submission, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/YuMe

I have updated it to reflect your comment of it not being written encyclopaedically. This is my first Wiki entry. I hope the edits suffice. Let me know your thoughts. I appreciate your help and patience with me in getting this published.

Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Missmichellemeyer (talk • contribs) 23:00, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:East–West Schism
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:East–West Schism. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 11:15, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 13:16, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:07, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

User talk:Promotor Veritatis
I have removed your "brick wall" comment from this talk page. Although editors stated it should be struck, I would go further as I predict this editor would pounce on it as evidence of Wikipedia being a troublesome and problematic environment. Ritchie333 (talk)  (cont)   16:00, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Which it might be... for him Fair do's though, I would've done as requested but AFK there, making a hot toddy.  Basket Feudalist 16:02, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I've removed your comment(s) again, hope you don't mind - just appears confusing otherwise! GiantSnowman 17:40, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I suppose it would rather hang in mid-air slightly....! Cheers. Basket Feudalist 17:44, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I still think you should consider finding a mentor. I do believe you have the makings of a good contributor, but you could benefit from taking a little pause for thought sometimes.  Seriously. Deb (talk) 21:11, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions warning
Per WP:ARBCOM/TROUBLES, all articles that "could be reasonably construed as being related to The Troubles, Irish nationalism, and British nationalism in relation to Ireland" are under a WP:1RR restriction and are subject to discretionary sanctions. You just came very close to violating the 1RR - please take more care in the future, and consider your tone when discussing these articles with other editors. Thanks. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 18:04, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I've dealt with your attitude problem on your TP, if that's OK. Basket Feudalist 18:16, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Senkaku Islands dispute
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Senkaku Islands dispute. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 15:15, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Hello,

I wrote and submitted a Wikipedia article (my first!) about Hank Risan (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Hank_Risan), an accomplished individual in many ways. The article was rejected for insufficient referencing. In my next submission, should I "play it safe" and remove anything that isn't reference-able, such as childhood, education, and early career stuff for which references can't be found? For example, Risan owns a lot of *very expensive* works by Banksy, the famous graffiti artist, and other famous artists. I've viewed the works, many of which hang in his home in Santa Cruz, but I can't reference this. He won a Natl Science Foundation award some 27 years ago, but I could not find a reference. He worked with numerous famous scientists and mathematicians in leading universities, but there are no references for these important career-building events. There are many such instances of significant events and achievements in Risan's life that I can't find references. Should I simply pare his article back to the bare bones, and rebuild from there, as references become available? Is that the best approach?

Many thanks! Bbmusicman (talk) 19:26, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Your signature
Hi YCALAM, I notice your signature doesn't include a link to your Talk page. This makes it difficult for people to contact you. Particularly if you're working at AfC or the Teahouse I think it's essential to have a direct link (but it's also a Wikipedia requirement). You might want to address the problem! Hwyl fawr! Sionk (talk) 15:14, 23 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Cheers! On it, Sionk. happy Saturday to ye! Basket Feudalist 16:06, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Baltic states-related articles
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Baltic states-related articles. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 17:15, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for wasting my time with your response to me inquiry about the Allah Las article rejection
Hi thanks for your very helpful response regarding my article submission that you rejected and described as looking "sh*te to [you]", I'm new at this so I am really appreciative that you addressed my questions so clearly, it's encouraging to help me become a more active contributor! wikipedia talk:articles for creation/Allah Las

I don't speak gaelic, though, so I can only assume you were saying something about the Book of Kells or Guinness?

Keep up the good work!

Jeffrey.stottlemyer (talk) 19:32, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Third Crusade, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Siege of Acre (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Re: Autonomous Landing Hazard Avoidance Technology (ALHAT),
Thank you for approving this article. Andrew Swallow (talk) 16:12, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Nice when people say thanks Cheers. Basket Feudalist  16:14, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Question
What do you mean by ? As far as I know, I never submitted an AfC... what is this notice about? πr2 (t • c) 17:10, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Apparently it was on the AFC sandbox. You didn't need to send me the message. In fact, I reverted my tests on the page. I did not write the content of that sandbox. πr2 (<i style="color:#0f3;font-family:Arial">t</i> • <i style="color:#03f;font-family:Arial">c</i>) 17:18, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 19:15, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Northeastern United States
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Northeastern United States. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 21:15, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Rape culture
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Rape culture. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 15:15, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

The Teahouse Turns One!
It's been an exciting year for the Teahouse and you were a part of it. Thanks so much for visiting, asking questions, sharing answers, being friendly and helpful, and just keeping Teahouse an awesome place. You can read more about the impact we're having and the reflections of other guests and hosts like you. Please come by the Teahouse to celebrate with us, and enjoy this sparkly cupcake badge as our way of saying thank you. And, Happy Birthday!


 * --Ocaasi and the rest of the Teahouse Team 22:28, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:57, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of Christian pilgrimage sites
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of Christian pilgrimage sites. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 17:15, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Speedof.me
I'm sorry, but I have undone your move of this article to mainspace -- without a credible assertion of notability, it is not likely to survive a WP:CSD, let alone a full AfD discussion. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 18:23, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
 * You again? lol <b style="color:Green;">Basket </b><sub style="color:orange;">Feudalist 18:35, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Time to stay off of WP:ANI
Based on this inappropriate and uncivil comment, as well as this clearly unhelpful comment, I'm asking you to refrain from further comments on ANI at this time. The purpose of ANI is to help, and not to demean or belittle. Neither of your comments were helpful in the least (✉→BWilkins←✎) 21:17, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Agreed. Went to ANI to see if I could change my username; saw this guys posts and was shocked at the unspeakable rudeness and incivility. Good to see there helpful people here anyway, thanks Bwilkins. Username talkpage (talk) 21:29, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
 * I appreciate both your interactions on this TP; needless to say, your opinions are completely irrelevant to me. I apologise if I have somehow implied that you have any kind of relevancy here. Cheers! <b style="color:Green;">Basket </b><sub style="color:orange;">Feudalist 22:25, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
 * No problem, just don't do it again. I'm sure nothing more will come of this; but behave in future. Thanks Username talkpage (talk) 22:31, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
 * How fast is your bike? You want to get on it quick time, son. PS: Haven't you got an essay to get in? <b style="color:Green;">Basket </b><sub style="color:orange;">Feudalist 22:36, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

March 2013
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 22:37, 2 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Oh, not again! Look, you are obviously a clever bloke (or girl).  Why do you keep letting your typing fingers run away with you?  Get yourself a mentor and start down that path of becoming a respected contributor.  I feel sure you can. Deb (talk) 21:25, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

, we moved your Teahouse host profile
Hello You Can Act Like A Man! Thank you for being a host at the Teahouse. However, we haven't heard from you lately, so our bot has moved your Host profile from the host landing page to the host breakroom. No worries; you can always just and our bot will move your profile back. Editing any Teahouse-related page will do the same thing for you. If you would prefer not to receive reminders like this, you can unsubscribe here. Thanks for your help at the Teahouse! HostBot (talk) 03:30, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Your contributions at AFC
I have reversed a number of your accepted articles for multiple problems with the content. This includes BLPs without any reliable independent sources, articles that read like an advertisement, articles without wikimarkup or broken references, articles written as essays or loaded with unencyclopedic language and non-notable subjects. This is not acceptable. Articles accepted via AFC have to stand a reasonable chance of surviving as well as fully conforming to wikipedia standards. Please do not accept any further articles at AFC until you have carefully reviewed them to ensure that they are fully compliant with NPOV/N/BLP & MOS. Spartaz Humbug! 14:02, 3 March 2013 (UTC)


 * You still haven't amended your signature (as already mentioned) to allow editors direct access to your Talk page. In my view you should do that too, before going anywhere near AfC or the Teahouse. Sionk (talk) 14:50, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
 * They sort-of have, as I can access their talk page from any signed post outside of this user's talk. I've noticed this glitch on at least one other account (Starship9000) Luke no 94  (talk) 15:42, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Ah interesting. Thanks for pointing that out. Mind you, I still don't like these confusing signatures that lead people to pages with a totally different name! It's not great when you're working with newbies on a regular basis. Sionk (talk) 16:11, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Semiformal restrictions
In case you have not yet noticed: you now have semiformal topic bans on AFC and AN/ANI. Although you may improve articles in the AFC incubation process, you may not promote nor decline any submissions. Likewise, although you may file a formal AN/ANI complaint if needed, you are not permitted to comment on any AN/ANI thread that is not related to your own filing. If you would like these restrictions made formal, we can easily do so, but I'm certain that you can live for at least 3 months under these restrictions - or else you'll see yourself in the same situation you're in now pretty quickly (✉→BWilkins←✎) 14:39, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Case in point: The Rotary Club of Milton. Drmies (talk) 17:55, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Limerick Pogrom
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Limerick Pogrom. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 23:15, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bill Biggart
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Bill Biggart. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 01:15, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:51, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Computus
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Computus. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 03:15, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

afc
I have spent all today screening every one of your AfC approvals, except the ones dealing with popular music, a field about which I am too ignorant to trust my judgment. I found about 60% of them good, and the others evenly divided between improvable and candidates for deletion. I've nominated a few for speedy and a few for AfD, and will be proceeding through the others during the next week--I do not like to nominate articles more rapidly than they can be defended. The improvements will take a little longer. What I have not yet been able to screen are the ones you did not approve, to see which ones have some promise, but many of them are turning up as relists for approval, and will mostly be rejected again by whoever does them. Based on what I see there, you did those generally right by my standards.

When I started working of AfCs a few months ago, (I had previously only worked on articles submitted at NPP) I was reluctant to turn down anything promising, and accepted anything I though might conceivably pass an AfD. I soon realised, though, that I was not helping people by accepting articles that would likely be rejected; even if some ended up passing an AfD, if they were improved first, they wouldn't be challenged and the contributor would have a better experience here--and we would get better articles. Of course they will only be really helped if they get significant personal targeting assistance about what is wrong, and I know how slow & difficult that is. Please don't think any of my comments are directed personally--if any seem worded that way I apologize, and will try to avoid it--I want to encourage you to return to patrolling fairly soon,   slowly,  with a higher standard, and giving more personal assistance. I suggest a good way to do it is to neither accept nor decline, but comment. Sometimes that;s more helpful than anything else if you remember to check they get notified.  DGG ( talk ) 06:32, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Fort Hood shooting
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Fort Hood shooting. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 05:15, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Rape culture
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Rape culture. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 07:15, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Karl Marx
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Karl Marx. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 10:15, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Pope Benedict XVI
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Pope Benedict XVI. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 12:15, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:53, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (clergy)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (clergy). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 14:15, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Vital articles
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Vital articles. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 16:15, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Turkey
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Turkey. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 18:15, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Have nominated Impalement to GA
I would like to thank you for your previous acerbic comment; they helped me to reshape the article into a better form (although the comment DID hurt! Sometimes, pain is the right medicine..:-)).Arildnordby (talk) 18:57, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Simon Wiesenthal
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Simon Wiesenthal. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 02:16, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Come on back
Reflect on your user name and don't sulk. Deb (talk) 15:19, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Falkland Islands sovereignty dispute
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Falkland Islands sovereignty dispute. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 07:15, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ferenc Szaniszló
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ferenc Szaniszló. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 09:15, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Catholicism
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Catholicism. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 08:17, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Chronology of the Bible
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Chronology of the Bible. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 10:15, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Wars of the Roses
You might be interested in helping Bill with his revamp of this article:User:Bill the Cat 7/sandbox Deb (talk) 07:18, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
 * oops, sorry, didn't notice you'd already been there! Deb (talk) 07:20, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Deb, yes- but for the life of me I couldn't (and, for the life of me, still can't-!) find a link to his sandbox, so thanks very much for providing that here! Mind you I didn't think it was protocol to go around editing other peoples user pages? <b style="color:Green;">Basket </b><sub style="color:orange;">Feudalist 11:00, 2 April 2013 (UTC)


 * It isn't, but he invited us. Deb (talk) 11:56, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Willem Jeths, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Composition, Best and BUMA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:11, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Abrahams Commission
I have added several cleanup tags to the article. I recommend that you resolve these issues before you take the article to GA. I do not believe that the article is ready for GA status in its current state, and not having significantly contributed to the article yourself, mayI ask why you nominated it?  Puffin  Let's talk! 09:43, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello
Thanks for the gesture! Always a pleasure! Evlekis (Евлекис) (argue) 13:35, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Pleasure. Good luck with your case! <b style="color:Green;">Basket </b><sub style="color:orange;">Feudalist 14:08, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

You have a message!
- Jayadevp  13  11:59, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

You Are Vastly Amusing
I have just landed on this strange planet. The Welcome Wagon Lady was quite rude & bestowed upon me the elusive honor of Overzealous Moderator Deleting My First Comment. The article in question was a hot mess. I'm thinking it was hers to be so huffy about the preciousss. I didn't even touch anything. I simply said *OK here's how you fix this*. In about a thousand words. It was that much of a hot mess. Didn't move so much as a comma. People seem to be very possessive of their punctuation round here. Oh, I am also now known as Yet Another Self-Proclaimed Historian Who Composes Hysterical Diatribes or some such nonsense as well. Like, who knew stating credentials up front was considered a bad thing & would make one an object of jeering derision? One would think they would be thrilled to have an expert on board who can correct all the dissemination of historical misinformation. All in all, I think I've done very well in my first 48 hrs. I rarely aggravate anyone that quickly. Anyway (I am long-winded, mea culpa), I've been randomly flipping through things historical to keep the Moderator-Stalker on its toes, never knowing in what historical period I will be arsed to pop up next with another Hysterical Diatribe (I know I am being carefully scrutinized as a Pet Project because on my 2nd post she quietly snuck in & actually edited something I said was wrong, so perhaps she is coming to realize that in past internet incarnations I have also been known as I Am Never Wrong) - confounded her by going straight from obscure Tudor talk to grandchildren of Edward III. I think it was on the Richard III talk pg that I ran into you, but don't quote me, I've been bopping all over the place, & I aspire to your level of retort. Sincerely. Truly.

Then I came over here to lurk (I don't consider that the same as stalking, do you?) & became even more vastly amused. I like your style. You're like that irreverent kid kicking back in the far reaches of the classroom who already knows more than the teacher ever will & using the class as a platform for hijinks. They take themselves so seriously here. Shake-ups can be fun.

And anyone who likes medieval warfare & the WOTR can't be all bad. I do. (Why isn't there anything useful in the toolbar, like devil-faced emoticons?) So kudos, props, & cheers to you, & I shall be very dejected if they kick you out before they kick me out :-P  Keep up the good work. ScarletRibbons (talk) 12:27, 15 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Cheers. Although maybe take just a little more water with it...?! <b style="color:Green;">Basket </b><sub style="color:orange;">Feudalist 12:40, 15 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Mmmm...single-malt Scotch. (Hope that doesn't offend the Irish whisky!) ScarletRibbons (talk) 19:29, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
 * You're pretty fcuking sharp yerself bro! I votes you for Admin!!! <b style="color:Green;">Basket </b><sub style="color:orange;">Feudalist 10:56, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:53, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Feedback request service
Hello! I'm contacting you because you are one of the editors in the Feedback Request Service list for history. I just created a RFC concerning the lead of Istanbul (Talk:Istanbul). If you have time, we would appreciate your input. Thanks! Cavann (talk) 04:46, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

SuggestBot beta test
Hi, and thanks so much for signing up to test the new SuggestBot design! You can find your suggestions and the survey on this page. Let me know if you have any questions. Cheers, Nettrom (talk) 17:58, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Istanbul
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Istanbul. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 12:16, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of metropolitan areas of the United States
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of metropolitan areas of the United States. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 06:15, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 04:12, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Firing Squad stuff
The burden of proof should be on those seeking the inclusion of an image to establish its authenticity. On the specific image, the accompanying text, the publisher, and date of publication create enough doubt to warrant removal. I'll add another image to replace it. Rsloch (talk) 14:08, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Comfort women
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Comfort women. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 10:27, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 15:20, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:BP
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:BP. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 19:15, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Dodge City, Kansas
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Dodge City, Kansas. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 21:15, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

, we moved your Teahouse host profile
Hello You Can Act Like A Man! Thank you for being a host at the Teahouse. However, we haven't heard from you lately, so our bot has moved your Host profile from the host landing page to the host breakroom. No worries; you can always just and our bot will move your profile back. Editing any Teahouse-related page will do the same thing for you. If you would prefer not to receive reminders like this, you can unsubscribe here. Thanks for your help at the Teahouse! HostBot (talk) 03:50, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Nazi Germany
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Nazi Germany. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 17:16, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

AfD / AfC
I have just nominated two articles you accepted from AfC a while ago, for deletion -- you may want to comment: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chad Bowie., and "Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reclaim Love  DGG ( talk ) 03:29, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Armoured fighting vehicle
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Armoured fighting vehicle. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service.'' — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 09:15, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Fabrika automobila Priboj
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Fabrika automobila Priboj. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service.'' — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 14:15, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

WikiFavour
Hello, I hope you are doing good! I need a favour form you. Do you live in Dublin? Is for an article I am working on. Reply at my Talk please :) Thanks <span style="font-family:'Arial',cursive"> Ms.Bono  (zootalk) ☆ 19:08, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Toluca Lake, Los Angeles
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Toluca Lake, Los Angeles. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service.'' — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 06:15, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Infobox person
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Infobox person. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service.'' — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 22:15, 15 July 2013 (UTC)