User talk:Youaregood

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles you created. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:
 * Place  on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
 * Make your case on the article's .

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 18:37, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 18:43, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Request "i need to change the title of an article"
Unfortunately, changing the name of the article Yung suk kim would not prevent it going through the speedy deletion process. The problem is not the name of the article, but the subject. Under wikipedia's rules, articles about living people need to be about notable persons - and you have not provided evidence of notability. That does not mean that it would not be appropriate as an article, just that you have not given citations of notability. You need to find reliable websites that give information about him. Noting books where he has contributed does not qualify - firstly, being published does not necessarily mean that you are notable; secondly, unless editors on wikipedia have access to the works in questions, we have no way of verifying the contents!

I am only a novice editor, so I am not sure why you asked me (I can only assume that you saw something I did on Wikipedia's Help Desk). However, my advice to you is don't despair! Find suitable citations, and put them into the article (you might want to move it back to your user space while you work on it), then perhaps ask at the Help Desk for someone to look at it and give advice.

Hope this helps - I'm sorry I can't do more.  Phantom Steve  ( Contact Me, My Contribs ) 20:07, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --SineBot (talk) 21:39, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Copyright violations in Yung Suk Kim article
I have removed the copyrighted material from the above article.

The quotes from the website are copyrighted, and so legally cannot be put in the article. The quote from the book cover are likewise copyrighted.

If you own the copyright, then you can give permission for the text to be included on wikipedia - see "Copyright owners who submitted their own work to Wikipedia".

Don't be disheartened! The article is a good starter article, although it still needs some improvement, but that will be worked on.

If you have any questions, leave me a message on my Talk Page.  Phantom Steve  ( Contact Me, My Contribs ) 16:52, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Patte standing at the campus of Vanderbilt University.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Patte standing at the campus of Vanderbilt University.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 14:46, 6 April 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 14:46, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Yung Suk Kim


The article Yung Suk Kim has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article blanked by the original creator. IMHO the article is too old, and has too many edits from others to qualify for G7 CSD.  But notability appears marginal, so I'll do this procedural PROD for the sake of the wishes of the original creator.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TexasAndroid (talk) 21:43, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

Your edits to Yung Suk Kim
Hello, Youaregood. Thank you for your contributions and thank you for being responsive to the tag I added; I think your edits yesterday addressed the issue correctly.

I did notice that all your Wikipedia edits have been related to Dr. Kim, and that your username is the same as his website name. For that reason, I wonder if you are personally associated with Dr. Kim. If that is the case, you are welcome to participate on Wikipedia, but you are also required by Wikipedia's terms of use to disclose that you have a relationship to Dr. Kim when you make edits related to him. Wikipedia's conflict of interest policy also strongly discourages you from editing his article directly; it is much better to ask on the talk page for another editor, like me, to make the changes you feel are appropriate. I'm sure you understand that ethical standards like these are part of the reason that Wikipedia is so trusted, and that having a Wikipedia page is so valued!

I'm more than happy to answer any questions you might have.—Neil P. Quinn (talk) 05:37, 20 August 2016 (UTC)