User talk:Youmeatsixx

April 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to You Me At Six, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: You Me At Six was changed by Youmeatsixx (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-04-07T12:43:40+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 12:43, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page You Me At Six. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Kingpin13 (talk) 12:48, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Save It For The Bedroom (Re-release)
A tag has been placed on Save It For The Bedroom (Re-release) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Cabe 6403  (Talk•Sign) 09:00, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of If I Were In Your Shoes
A tag has been placed on If I Were In Your Shoes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Cabe 6403  (Talk•Sign) 09:09, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Friendly notice
Hi there, If you are indeed a member of youmeatsix then first off, welcome to wikipedia, glad to have you :) I'm quite a big fan of your music and it was I who fought to get the main youmeatsix article recreated once it was deleted. However, adding first party original research (i.e. Stuff you know about your own band like song meanings etc) is usually frowned upon due to the fact it can't be verified by a third party source. Have a quick gander at WP:NOR to read more on this. Another note is that not just anything can have an article on wikipedia. Subjects have to be notable, see WP:N. For individual songs and singles they have to meet the notability requirements stated at WP:MUSIC, an exerpt: "Most songs do not rise to notability for an independent article and should redirect to another relevant article, such as for the songwriter, a prominent album or for the artist who prominently performed the song. Songs that have been ranked on national or significant music charts, that have won significant awards or honors or that have been performed independently by several notable artists, bands or groups are probably notable. Notability aside, a separate article on a song is only appropriate when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album."

Unfortunatly this means that some of the articles you have created for your songs may be deleted. May I suggest that for "Save It For The Bedroom" and the re-release you create an article called Save It For The Bedroom and have a section on the re-release. This should meet requirements though I don't think either on their own would.

Last of all, when linking articles on wikipedia simply type the name of the article and  on either end such as You Me At Six.

Hope this helps If you have any questions don't hesitate to ask on my talk page, just head over there, edit the page and leave a message at the bottom. Don't forget to sign your posts with 4 tildes ( ~ )
 * Cabe 6403  (Talk•Sign) 09:13, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page You Me At Six has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoy gabs adds 14:52, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Take Off Your Colours Deluxe Edition
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Take Off Your Colours Deluxe Edition, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails wp:music.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -- Jeandré, 2009-05-01t15:58z 15:58, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jealous Minds Think Alike


The article Jealous Minds Think Alike has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 19:42, 30 April 2015 (UTC)