User talk:Youness Chokri

May 2024
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Vaginismus. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Versa geek  21:53, 15 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Dear Versageek ,
 * I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to request approval to add an external link to the page on Wikipedia. The link I propose is to a high-quality, authoritative source that provides valuable information relevant to the article's subject matter.
 * The source has been thoroughly reviewed and offers comprehensive insights that will enhance the reader's understanding. It adheres to Wikipedia’s guidelines for reliable sources and adds significant value by providing additional context and up-to-date information.
 * Thank you for considering my request. I am committed to ensuring that Wikipedia remains a reliable and informative resource for everyone.
 * Best regards,
 * Youness Chokri Youness Chokri (talk) 22:04, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Kodi (software). Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Aoidh (talk) 22:20, 15 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Dear Aoidh,
 * I hope you are doing well. I am writing to request approval to add an external link to the page on Wikipedia. The link I propose is to a high-quality, authoritative source that provides valuable information relevant to the article's subject matter.
 * The source has been thoroughly reviewed and offers comprehensive insights that will enhance the reader's understanding. It adheres to Wikipedia’s guidelines for reliable sources and adds significant value by providing additional context and up-to-date information.
 * Thank you for considering my request. I am committed to ensuring that Wikipedia remains a reliable and informative resource for everyone.
 * Best regards,
 * Youness Chokri Youness Chokri (talk) 22:27, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Ponyo bons mots 22:34, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

The domain readmorebuzz.com was registered on February 21, 2024. Do you seriously expect us to believe that a site that new meets Wikipedia's definition of a reliable source? --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 04:15, 16 May 2024 (UTC)