User talk:YoungGA23/Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica

Peer Review Group Feedback
Under Survival in the stomach, make sure to put an in-text citation. The main article also is incomplete, so make sure to add new sections and more info in existing sections. Barbia01 (talk) 13:52, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Peer Review Assignment- Cassandra Leahy
Make sure that you have enough reliable sources for the topics you added to your sandbox. I didn't see any citations/links yet for the information you added. Make sure that the sources that you have in your bibliography align with the material you added so you are giving credit to the appropriate article. The few links that you do have are for pdfs so make sure that they work properly.

I also don't see any information about transmission, so you could talk about how a host is infected. Our group found a lot of articles about evolution and transmission so that could be a good starting point.

There is little to no information on the history.

The lead sentence doesn't really introduce the topics that will be discusses in the article, so maybe find a way to incorporate the main ideas of each topic you will address. Crl89512 (talk) 14:08, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Peer Review Assignment
The topics that you are planning to add are good, but I also agree that they can be expanded on. When youre talking about "certain scenarios that can occur to decrease the infection risk," under the survival in the stomach, what are those certain scenarios? Also, within that same paragraph, there is not much stated regarding how the microbe actually survives in the stomach. The last sentence that states the defensive technique within acidic stomach conditions is very good though. I think y'all have a good foundation going it just needs some more details and, as stated in the above reply, more citations as well! Barbia01 (talk) 19:43, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Peer Review
I could not find the Kingsley source that is in your sandbox. I think this article would have great information. The source that is on the wiki article (labeled as 4) says that there are over 2,300 serovars but in the article, it reads that there are 2,500 serovars. In your sandbox, it says 2,500 and it is noted that a source is needed. Looking at the source provided on the wiki article, the source is from 2004. Try to find an updated one that can support the claim of 2,500 serovars. There are also three sources in your bibliography but there is no information on those in your sandbox.

The section labeled Survival in the stomach that is posted in your sandbox has very good information. However, I do not know where it came from. Is this from the wiki article you are working on, or is this from one of your sources?

Looking at the wiki article, the section of Serovars is filled with a lot of information that could be separated. Adding sections such as history and structure might be good for your article. Macaroon19 (talk) 14:50, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Peer Review
I do like how you will discuss drug resistance and metabolism. With these subjects, are you adding a new section or adding to existing sections? If you are adding to existing sections, I would suggest adding a snip-it of each paragraph you plan on editing into the sandbox. I think that would help with organization as well.

I am a little confused on the use of the table. Its relationship to the information may need to be a bit clearer. Is that relating to drug resistance?

GraceFauna (talk) 18:55, 6 October 2023 (UTC)