User talk:Young Cdn

November 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. ''The article does still read like an advertisement and a few more references wouldn't hurt, the templates aren't bad, plenty of fine, encyclopedic articles have them. In the long run they'll help improve the article. By removing them one might assume that it truly is intended as an advert and you wish to disguise that.'' Synchronism (talk) 01:19, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. ''None of your edits has addressed the marked concerns. If you think I've overlooked something, please state it on the article's talk/disscussion page or below here. Thanks again'' Synchronism (talk) 01:28, 17 November 2008 (UTC)


 * I don't get what you mean by recentism at all...and how can information that is directly from the governing documents be considered an advertisement?--Young_Cdn (talk) 18:01, 17 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi Young Cdn,


 * Here are some examples of other articles people find on Wikipedia that are like the one you've authored, they may have their own problems or not, and they all have their well-done aspects:
 * International Federation of Liberal Youth
 * Scottish Youth Parliament
 * Panafrican Youth Union
 * YMCA Youth and Government


 * I found them on this list: List of youth empowerment organizations


 * By recentism it is meant, like the template says, that recent events should be kept in historical perspective. Did the Canadian Youth Assembly spontaneously form in 2008 as it is implied?  If so, that is an extraordinary example of a grass roots organization and should be made explicit and referenced by a secondary source.  But, if it evolved from predecessor organizations or has its roots in long running social currents, it should say so.


 * Articles need to be reliably sourced to verify content, this means a respectable work of the media, authors, scholars and so on. Only when describing works of fiction or art is it exceptable to use the subject as a reference in its own right.  External links to the oraganization are OK, however, Wikipedia is not a WP:soapbox to reitierate any organization's own point of view.  You don't see too many standalone mission statement/goals sections (however noble or even notable) about political or non-profit organizations, charities and so on in encyclopedias, you see critical and historical perspective, at least aren't you supposed to? – And thanks for engaging in a discussion, Synchronism (talk) 22:51, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Adoption offer
Hi Young Cdn! I saw on your user page you said that you are interested in being adopted. If you would like me to be your adopter, just let me know by leaving me a note on my talk page. I'd be glad to help you out.   α Яβ ιτ Я α Я ι ŁΨθ  ( talk ) 21:43, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

CYA
The article looks much better, :)Synchronism (talk) 07:05, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Image problem
No problem Young Cdn. Do you think that the image may have been deleted? What exactly was the name if the image (such as Image:Example.jpg)?   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 00:55, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Hm, I'm not sure exactly what happened to it. Try following the instructions here. Let me know if you have any problems. Good luck,   A rbitrarily 0    ( talk ) 18:33, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Userboxes
You can find many userboxes here. Just add the appropriate text to your user page, to produce: Let me know if you have problems.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 16:34, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

License tagging for File:CYA-AJC.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:CYA-AJC.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:05, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay, the image seems to be tagged properly. Let me know if you get a message like this again, because I didn't see any problems with it. Good luck,   A rbitrarily 0    ( talk ) 01:08, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:CYA-AJC.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:CYA-AJC.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:05, 2 October 2012 (UTC)