User talk:Younglust44

November 2023
Hello, I'm MrOllie. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. MrOllie (talk) 18:14, 21 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello MrOllie. Thank you for your message.
 * How is it not constructive to inform the Wikipedia user that mods and admins consider right-wing media unreliable while encouraging the use of left-wing media?
 * This can save a right leaning person a lot of time from ever editing political articles because the mods will revert the change anyway. Younglust44 (talk) 18:24, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I have no idea what you're talking about. Plenty of right leaning sources are just fine, like the Wall Street Journal or the Weekly Standard. MrOllie (talk) 18:35, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Wall Street Journal is center. https://www.allsides.com/news-source/wall-street-journal-media-bias
 * Thanks for pointing out the Weekly Standard. However, one exception does not invalidate the general consensus on the page which is leaning towards left. That should be mentioned, hence my edit.
 * Do you have any other example of right leaning outlet?
 * Fox News Politics, the Daily Wire, the Daily Caller, etc… are all considered "unreliable" by the page.
 * While socialist outlets like Jacobin are considered "reliable" Younglust44 (talk) 18:46, 21 November 2023 (UTC)