User talk:Yourpro

A tag has been placed on Yourpro, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Fan-1967 14:46, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Also
You should review Notability (web). Even if the article weren't a blatant ad, it appears to be a new site that has achieved no notability yet. Wikipedia is not for providing exposure for new, unknown sites, only documenting those which already meet our notability standards. This one doesn't. There are thousands of myspace-type sites. This is another. Fan-1967 14:54, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

... and again
A tag has been placed on Yourpro, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

Please stop trying to advertise your site here. Fan-1967 19:23, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Yourpro
Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following: Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. David Mestel(Talk) 19:26, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Place   on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
 * 2) Make your case on the article's .
 * [[Image:Stop_hand.svg|left|30px]] This is your last warning. The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from an article you created, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  David Mestel(Talk) 19:29, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Your comments on my Talk page
First of all, the claim of 900,000 members on yourpro.com is just nonsensical. In fact, by any measure, it doesn't come close to being a notable website, per our standards at: Notability (web). You want to compare your site to myspace? Let's see:
 * Google search for yourpro.com: 424 total hits
 * Google search for myspace.com: 35 million total hits.

The myspace article has been edited by dozens (maybe hundreds) of people, none of whom look like myspace employees. Multiple editors prevent an article from being an ad created by the subject.

Your article was edited by you, and was nothing but an incredibly blatant ad.

Notable subjects do not need to create articles on themselves. People will naturally create articles on them. If no one has thought your website worth an article, that is a strong indicator it does not deserve one. Fan-1967 22:10, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Your comments
What I like or dislike is irrelevant. That's why we have standards. Fan-1967 17:05, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Warnings
Please don't remove warnings from your talk page. David Mestel(Talk) 17:55, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Blocked
I have blocked you indefinitely from editing, since your only contributions have been repeatedly advertising your website. Despite many messages and warnings, you continued, so now you're blocked. Friday (talk) 21:59, 26 February 2007 (UTC)