User talk:Yoyisima17

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 20)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Whispering was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:VeryBadWizards/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:VeryBadWizards/sandbox Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Whispering&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:VeryBadWizards/sandbox reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 Whispe ring  20:58, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

September 2017
There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  03:10, 21 September 2017 (UTC)


 * I've done the rename (from User:VeryBadWizards), and another admin will review your unblock request. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:59, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Please describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked. PhilKnight (talk) 21:53, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi PhilKnight - after learning more about how adequate articles should be written and what the general rules for editing articles in Wikipedia, I will contribute by writing and editing articles and topics that are not directly linked to personal business or which could be considered as advertisement. I will make sure I have adequate information that can be used as reference to show a subject's notability. I will also make sure I use adequate citations when writing/editing an article. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yoyisima17 (talk • contribs) 17:49, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Do you intend to continue writing about "Very Bad Wizards" if unblocked? If no, why not?  Vanjagenije  (talk)  21:20, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Hello Vanjagenije, I first opened this page with the intention of writing a Wikipedia article for the Very Bad Wizards podcast. I have to admit that I ignored the rules and approved protocols when assigning an account name to a page, and the appropriate way to write an enciclopedia article, and that I failed to do my research first. With that said, I still want to write an article for the podcast, since I have no affiliation with their business other than been an avid listener. Additionally, I make a compromise to ask for assistance to other experience contributors, as well as to learn a style that follows all the rules before I send the article for approval. I would also like to contribute to other articles when possible. Thank you. Vanjagenije, I understand that you think all I "want" to do is to write a promortional article for a non-wp:notable podcast, but that is not it. I'm willing to cite all information used for it, as well as to expand to other noticeable contents related with the article. I may not have the experience you editors have, but I'm looking to learn how to write an article that reads as enciclopedia and not as advertisement. Not only do I want to write about the podcast, but about other topics too, and I would like to contribute to other articles already existing in Wikipedia. I respect this site a lot. I'm not really sure what is it that you are looking to hear from me so that I get unblocked, and that is unfortunate. Thank you. Yoyisima17 (talk) 20:01, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
 * There is no specific "thing" we want to hear from you. If you are able to convince us that you will be useful in building an encyclopedia, we will unblock you. If we are not convinced that you will be working on building an encyclopedia, you will not be unblocked. Since you want to write an article about the podcast, and since you understand WP:N, can you please provide some reliable sources to show that the said podcast is WP:NOTABLE for inclusion?  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:59, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Vanjagenije, I will work on getting those sources to show that the podcast is wp:notable. Could I kindly ask you to give me an example of what a good source looks like? Is it mentions from other notable sources, or maybe ratings from other authors enough? Do those sources need to be find on WP to be notable? Thanks for your pataince and all your support! Yoyisima17 (talk) 15:41, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
 * If you read WP:N, you probably found a link to the WP:Reliable sources page that explains what kind of sources are acceptable.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  19:29, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
 * OK. Once I read all the instruction material such the WP:Reliable sources etc., what should Indo next. Get back to you? Or should I draft a new article?Yoyisima17 (talk) 20:52, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I asked you above to provide some reliable sources to show that the said podcast is WP:NOTABLE for inclusion.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  23:13, 1 October 2017 (UTC)