User talk:Yozdek

Oceanography
Please save the oceams and oceanographers.

March 2021
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Chicken wire, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. ''What you are doing now is called edit warring, and it can get you blocked. If you wish to explain your reasoning, please do that on the article's talk page.'' Paradoctor (talk) 16:50, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Chicken as food, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. ''As explained in the other notice, you are edit warring here too, and it can get you blocked. If you think you have an argument that overrides MOS:SEEALSO, please lay it out on the article's talk page.'' Paradoctor (talk) 16:55, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

PARADOCTOR I AM REALLY SORRY IF I MADE A MISTAKE WHILE EDITING Yozdek (talk) 05:14, 18 March 2021 (UTC)


 * No harm done. I put up these warning because you weren't reacting to my reverts. You might want to read WP:CONSENSUS. If you have questions, the WP:TEAHOUSE is a friendly place, especially for newcomers. You can also ask me, or anyone, really. Just remember that we solve problems by discussing them. Happy editing, Paradoctor (talk) 07:58, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

C.D. Luis Ángel Firpo
Hello, could you give a wikification to the article, it is very badly edited.--OaxacaGenius (talk) 14:50, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Can you specify which article you are talking about Yozdek (talk) 15:58, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Is this article C.D. Luis Ángel Firpo OaxacaGenius (talk) 13:28, 30 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Information.svg Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.--OaxacaGenius (talk) 14:34, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Unblock
{{unblock|1=Dear amanda np, where have i done "excessive abuse"? Please unblock me and after doing so please tell me in my talkpage where i have done "excessive abuse". Yozdek (talk) 13:25, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Unblock
{{unblock|1=Dear amanda please unblock me. I am getting repeatedly blocked by you and you are not telling me where i have gone wrong Yozdek (talk) 08:45, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Unblock
{{unblock|1=Dear amanda np please tell me where i have gone wrong and unblock me Yozdek (talk) 08:48, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Yun Kong-hum


A tag has been placed on Yun Kong-hum requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. CommanderWaterford (talk) 09:43, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

YOU CAN DELETE. APPROVED. PLEASE DO TALK TO ME BEFORE YOU DELETE. CONFESSION: I WAS THE ONE WHO CREATED THIS PAGE Yozdek (talk) 09:50, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Uh talk to me ! Yozdek (talk) 09:57, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Please stop
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please stop adding inappropriate entries in the See also sections—see wp:NOTSEEALSO. Thank you. - DVdm (talk) 11:01, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

WHICH PAGE ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? Yozdek (talk) 11:34, 3 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Please indent talk page messages as outlined in wp:THREAD and wp:INDENT — see Help:Using talk pages. Also, try to avoid using all capitals when talking to people. That is considered shouting — see wp:SHOUTING. Thanks.
 * See the reverted edits at Special:Contributions/Yozdek. - DVdm (talk) 11:40, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: you just did it again at article Ma Jian (writer) with this edit: Qingdao is already linked in the article, so we do not list it in the See also section. - DVdm (talk) 11:46, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: and again with this edit in article Milk: the article Cheese is linked in the body of the article. - DVdm (talk) 11:48, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
 * And this. - DVdm (talk) 11:52, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Deng Xiaoping. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. You just dit it again at Deng Xiaoping with these two edits: both are already wikilinked in the article. You did this after you promised to be more careful. - DVdm (talk) 12:18, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Chinese Red Army, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. And again with this edit at Chinese Red Army. - DVdm (talk) 12:20, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Please tell me what mistake I did in the page of Chinese Red Army. Also mention if you are an admin Yozdek (talk) 12:23, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Please respond quickly as I want you to end this issue peacefully Yozdek (talk) 12:27, 3 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Please indent talk page messages as outlined in wp:THREAD and wp:INDENT — see Help:Using talk pages.
 * Again, the article that you added to the See also list is already linked in the article.
 * And you just did it again at Yishun triple murders with this edit, linking to Murder, which is already linked. Do you understand this? - DVdm (talk) 12:28, 3 June 2021 (UTC)


 * I know you want to say that what i am adding in See also list is already linked but if I add something which is not linked to any article then it will not be related to the article. Yozdek (talk) 12:31, 3 June 2021 (UTC)


 * (Response moved. Please respond here, not on my talk page)
 * If you don't understand the purpose and workings of See also sections in articles, then please stop adding entries to them altogether. - DVdm (talk) 12:40, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Brilliant Pebbles.

And again with this edit on article Brilliant Pebbles: the article Strategic Defense Initiative is already linked in the body of the article.

Likewise with this edit on article Strategic Defense Initiative: the article Ronald Reagan is already linked in the body of the article.

Note: are you doing this on purpose? - DVdm (talk) 17:44, 5 June 2021 (UTC)


 * My goodness! You are giving me nightmares Yozdek (talk) 01:48, 6 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Please indent talk page messages as outlined in wp:THREAD and wp:INDENT — see Help:Using talk pages.
 * Do you have any idea why your additions are inappropriate? Please answer the question. - DVdm (talk) 10:54, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - DVdm (talk) 11:08, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Please don't block me Yozdek (talk) 01:40, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Please suggest how to end this issue peacefully Yozdek (talk) 01:42, 7 June 2021 (UTC)


 * We don't want to block you if we can resolve this issue peacefully. If you have not read all the posts on this page in their entirety, you should read them and take them seriously. If you have not already visited the links at the top of this page, you should visit them. There is quite a lot of text there, so you don't have to read every word, but you should familiarize yourself with the guidelines that editors are expected to follow, if you intend to make useful contributions to Wikipedia. You should also read the discussion at the noticeboard listed above. It would be good if you would continue the discussion there.—Anita5192 (talk) 04:03, 7 June 2021 (UTC)


 * User, thanks for this edit. - DVdm (talk) 11:45, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Lu deibin
Hello, Yozdek. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lu deibin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:03, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Draft:Lu deibin


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Lu deibin, was deleted as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz Read! Talk! 20:32, 11 September 2021 (UTC)