User talk:Yperson

I don't know where the taxonomic comments came from, but it is accurate example so I cleaned it up.(R.K. Arnold) 03:07, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

heterarchy edits
Whether the taxonomic comments are true is not the point. The comments are unsubstantiated by the heterarchy article as it stands. The reference you cite in Science Daily never even uses the term heterarchy, so it does not substantiate the claim about horizontal genetic transfer being heterarchical.

More to the point, that entire discussion is currently in the first paragraph of this article. The first paragraph is no place for such detailed points. See the manual of style.—PaulTanenbaum (talk) 04:25, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Good point on article accuracy. See if you like the revisions. I do think it belongs in the 1st paragraph because it immediately demonstrates the interdisciplinary nature of HT/HR analysis. Social And Physical Sciences. I think too much detail would involve going into the formal processes such as Transformation, Transduction, in vitro Gene Therapy, etc....

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)