User talk:Yprk2023

Welcome!
  Hello, Yprk2023!  Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

  Getting Started

Tutorial Learn everything you need to know to get started. Introduction to contributing • Editing

• Referencing

• Images

• Tables

• Policies and guidelines

• Talk pages

• Navigating

• Manual of Style

The Teahouse Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips 
 * Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
 * It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
 * If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
 * Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
 * When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
 * If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
 * Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 14:37, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

December 2023
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions such as the edit(s) you made did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that.  ShaanSengupta  Talk 03:18, 13 December 2023 (UTC)


 * @Yprk2023 you have been continuously adding a site name Buckstopper as a reference to support you edits. This is the correct way with an incorrect thing. We only use reliable sources to support claims. You even undid my revert which brings to me make you want read some policies of Wikipedia.
 * Help:Referencing for beginners
 * Reliable sources
 * Citing sources
 * Inline citation
 * Verifiability
 * PROVEIT
 * No original research
 * The list goes endless. Read these and understand that the source you cited is not acceptable.
 *  ShaanSengupta  Talk 03:26, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
 * I gave the information supported by data from election commission of Rajasthan website and a news website which is a reliable source of information specially about Rajasthan. Just because you haven't heard about the website doesn't make it unreliable. You Should fact check the information. If the information is wrong you should definitely remove it. But if the information is correct what's the point of removing and saying its not constructive . You should be neutral and unbiased towards sources. Gud Luck Yprk2023 (talk) 03:32, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
 * @Yprk2023 you want us to believe that a website with less engagement is reliable. For example to prove Buckstopper Official handle on X (Twitter) less than 100 followers joined in March 2023 which is nearly 9 months. Average engagement on posts is 60. YouTube channel with less than 200 subscribers still a reliable agency? All these things show that the agency is not notable. Do you want more? Let it establish itself atleast.  ShaanSengupta  Talk 04:20, 13 December 2023 (UTC)