User talk:Yrbg2563

November 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=633015333 your edit] to AOA (band) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:41, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did to AOA (band), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 00:00, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at AOA (band) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 05:32, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to AOA (band). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 05:33, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at AOA (band). Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 05:40, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Do not add unsourced positions to the article
The positions you are adding are not in the citation. Do not add them again otherwise you will be reported. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 05:42, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

I saw you discussed the names with. I don't have an objection for that if you have valid references for the names. But you cannot change the positions without having a reference for the new positions you want to add. The current positions are referenced and changing them without providing a new reference is not allowed. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 06:00, 9 November 2014 (UTC) ‎

I didn't see this message earlier. I'll get to it. Yrbg2563 (talk) 06:49, 9 November 2014 (UTC)