User talk:Ys91620

Deletion discussion about Sagar Savaliya
Hello, Ys91620

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username JamesG5 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Sagar Savaliya, should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Sagar Savaliya.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

JamesG5 (talk) 09:08, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Savaliya.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Savaliya.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like (to release all rights),  (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 19:46, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi, I have taken that Image from a newspaper. I have mentioned it in its summary Source:- Dainik Bhaskar Author:-https://www.bhaskar.com/amp/news/GUJ-SUR-OMC-vikas-pagal-ho-gya-hai-slogan-by-sagar-savaliya-befaam-5750858-PHO.html. I have taken it from Independent and credible source which are in public domain. How can be it will be copyrighted? Ys91620 (talk) 01:53, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Savaliya.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Savaliya.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 20:39, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Review deletion of Savaliya.jpg
I have uploaded an image Savaliya.jpg. But it was deleted because of copyright infringement despite that I have mentioned I have taken from a newspaper in its summary such as Source :- Dainik Bhaskar Author :- I have taken it from an independent and credible source which is in public domain. How can be it will be copyrighted? Please help me helpme Ys91620 (talk) 04:16, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

Review deletion of Savaliya.jpg
I have uploaded an image Savaliya.jpg But Ys91620 (talk) 04:18, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

{unblock|reason=you have to trust me. Some of the whitespaces were added by mistake. I was a new editor at that time. Now I know the consequences of those mistakes. Trust me those mistake will never happen in future. I will remain very cautious. You should give me a chance to improve me }  Ys91620 (talk) 06:42, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Review deletion of Savaliya. jpg
I have uploaded an image Savaliya.jpg. But it was deleted because of copyright infringement despite that I have mentioned. I have taken it from a newspaper in its summary such as Source :- Dainik Bhaskar Author :- https://www.bhaskar.com/amp/news/GUJ-SUR-OMC-vikas-pagal-ho-gya-hai-slogan-by-sagar-savaliya-befaam-5750858-PHO.html I have taken it from an independent and credible source which is in public domain. How can be it will be copyrighted? Please help me Ys91620 (talk) 04:25, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Published photos are still copyrighted and cannot be uploaded to Wikipedia or Wikimedia Commons without a release by the copyright holder. In nearly all cases, taking a photo from a newspaper website is a violation of copyright. You may need to improve your understanding of what the term public domain means in relation to coyright issues.  — jmcgnh (talk) (contribs) 04:37, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

Whitespace
Please be more careful with your edits. You are performing edits that solely introduce unnecessary whitespace. This is abusive, so please stop. --Yamla (talk) 16:39, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nitish Kumar. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --Yamla (talk) 11:27, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.

Hi, Yamla give me another chance. If I will do something again then ban you will block me forever  Ys91620 (talk) 10:48, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
 * If you wish to be unblocked, make a request. You know how to do this. --Yamla (talk) 13:13, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

Unblock me
This was clear vandalism. This was overlinking and not productive. This was vandalism (or at least, did not match the citation provided, which amounts to the same thing]. This was vandalism. You were warned about your vandalism and decided to continue harming Wikipedia pages. Want to rewrite your unblock request? --Yamla (talk) 13:46, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Those were my mistake. I promise to you this will never happen again future. Unblock me I want to contribute usefully to Wikipedia}} Ys91620 (talk) 14:26, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Then I will never able to edit on Wikipedia. I should stop trying for unblocking   Ys91620 (talk) 08:55, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
 * That is, of course, your choice. Or you can try to be more convincing towards another administrator. 331dot (talk) 09:22, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Unblock me
Ys91620 (talk) 02:37, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

Review deletion of Sagar Savaliya
Hi, Sagar Savaliya should not be deleted. It follows every policy and guidelines of Wikipedia. After Sagar Savaliya nomination for deletion. I have improved this page significantly please check it. So I would request you to review your decision of deletion of Sagar Savaliya Ys91620 (talk) 10:49, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Any administrator should review. I believe that I should get a chance to correct myself  Ys91620 (talk) 05:50, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Unblock me
Ys91620 (talk) 13:30, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

You already have an open unblock request. Which one of the two do you wish people to review? --Yamla (talk) 13:59, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Rather than picking which one of the two you wanted people to review, you opened a third unblock request. As you are unable to figure out how to properly write unblock requests despite five separate attempts, I have revoked talk page access. If your current unblock requests are declined, that leaves you with WP:UTRS. --Yamla (talk) 11:04, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Unblock me
{unblock|reason= Any administrator should review. I believe that I should get an opportunity to correct my mistakes} Ys91620 (talk) 07:04, 28 February 2020 (UTC) Template disabled as this is not an unblock request. Yunshui 雲 水 09:19, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

You recent edits
It looks remarkably as though you are again trying to circumvent policy by pestering the admin who closed Articles for deletion/Sagar Savaliya. The deletion discussion gave a clear consensus to delete and was closed correctly; User:Sandstein could not have closed it any other way. If you wish to challenge his closure of the discussion you can do so at deletion review (I wouldn't bother; the decision will be endorsed and upheld without a doubt) but my advice would be to forget about writing this article, as the community has clearly judged it unsuitable. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia in this manner, you can expect to be blocked again in short order. Yunshui 雲 水 13:26, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Cabayi (talk) 14:09, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Unblock me
Ys91620 (talk) 06:00, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Unblock me
Ys91620 (talk) 12:57, 18 March 2020 (UTC)