User talk:YuRi YuZi

Thanks, but
Many images you are adding are uninformative (like that for Caesium). Please don't rush to add them, especially to WP:FA articles. Materialscientist (talk) 12:45, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

September 2017
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Wikipedia:Redirect, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 04:36, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 🙏


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on 🙏 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Valenciano (talk) 08:19, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Redirect, you may be blocked from editing. - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 03:35, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Nasah Montessori Center for Learning Inc. for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nasah Montessori Center for Learning Inc. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Nasah Montessori Center for Learning Inc. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Edgeweyes (talk) 12:25, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Millennia above 13th millennium


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Millennia above 13th millennium requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 18:48, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Apollo 13 MOVIE


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Apollo 13 MOVIE. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Apollo 13 (film). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Apollo 13 (film). If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. red dogsix (talk) 03:37, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Apollo 13 Movie


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Apollo 13 Movie, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. red dogsix (talk) 03:42, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

User page
Hi YuRi YuZi, I have unfortunately had to suppress some of your edits because they reveal too much personally identifiable information about you. We have a policy of protecting editors' safety by hiding such information if they share it. I'm really sorry about having to suppress your edits, and I know it's annoying, but it's for the best. Please don't re-add the information. For some useful information on privacy and safety, you can take a look at Guidance for younger editors and On privacy, confidentiality and discretion. Thanks, and sorry for messing about with your pages! -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 18:17, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

180-gon
Hello, thanks for creating new articles. Can you please add sources and categories to them? All articles need sources from the beginning. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 12:50, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve 180-gon
Hi, I'm Crystallizedcarbon. YuRi YuZi, thanks for creating 180-gon!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add references with in-depth coverage about the subject from independent reliable sources to the article to meet our verifiability and notablility requirements.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 22:06, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Eclipse.  Adotchar | reply here 23:24, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Heptacontadigon for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Heptacontadigon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Heptacontadigon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vasemmistolainen (talk) 23:35, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Bellevue hospital main gate.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bellevue hospital main gate.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Peacock (talk) 12:38, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:50, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Bellevue hospital main gate.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Bellevue hospital main gate.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 01:47, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Edits to Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Road junction lists
I'm unsure why you feel the need for an additional example on Manual of Style/Road junction lists. The ones that are there were carefully chosen to reflect a specific variety of examples. If you feel the need to propose an additional example, you should do so on the talk page, WT:RJL with your reasoning.  Imzadi 1979  →   08:54, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
Your addition to Hospital has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. - DVdm (talk) 11:06, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Super Mario Galaxy
Don't experiment like that. You will get yourself wp:blocked. I was about to report your for experimenting. If you want to try something like that, use wp:show preview - you can see it almost as if it was saved - or your sandbox. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 07:34, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

November 2017
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 10 days for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. m.o.p 17:55, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Hi there! Thank you for editing Wikipedia. While your efforts to improve the encyclopedia are appreciated, I've blocked you due to consistent disruptive editing. Blanking pages (1,2, 3), whether it's to test something, accidental, for fun, etc., is highly disruptive and will not be tolerated. Please use the sandbox for that in the future. You may also find the preview function useful for not making edits you didn't mean to.

Likewise, it is generally not appreciated if you edit another user's userpage without their permission.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask! m.o.p 18:20, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Good Dinosaur. --Mr Fink (talk) 03:06, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Hunthagon for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hunthagon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Hunthagon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -KAP03(Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions &bull;&#32;Email) 06:36, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, as you did with Hunthagon. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 10:43, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:31, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Manual of Style/Road junction lists
Please refrain from editing that page in the future without consensus for your changes. By changing the colors in the table as you did, you unilaterally changed the article standards for the junction list section of road articles across the English Wikipedia. In the future, if you'd like us to change something on that page, please start a discussion on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Road junction lists first.  Imzadi 1979  →   13:38, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Editing while logged out
You've been warned about edit warring when you're edits have been reverted, and you've even been blocked from editing because of it. Logging out to make the same edits in an attempt to avoid scrutiny is considered sockpuppetry and may result in you being blocked again. TimBuck2 (talk) 00:47, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
Thanks for thanking me for edit!

Cyrus noto3at bulaga (Talk to me ) 01:00, 28 February 2018 (UTC) 

Blocked for sockpuppetry
Bbb23 blocked me for an unlimited time.

Nomination of 180-gon for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 180-gon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/180-gon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 22:02, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Black dwarf.gif


The file File:Black dwarf.gif has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 13 June 2019 (UTC)