User talk:Yuan2019/sandbox

Peer Review - Digital Curation Article for INST604 Wikipedia Assignment
Overview: There are some grammatical and formatting errors throughout the writing. For example: "Digital curation Progressively (is this supposed to be a title?), digital curation acts as a (should be an) umbrella concept that include (includes) many subsets appearing as related terms such as digital asset management, (space needed between comma and word) data curation, (space needed) digital preservation, and electronic records management.[1]

Watch out for dropped articles like "the" "a" and "an" throughout sentences.

Overall, you obviously have a great grasp of the material and are able to describe it in term that the lay person can also grasp. Good job!

Methodology: I like the succinct way you described the "Methodology" using bullets and action based language. It made the process much more simple to understand. Perhaps a visual or diagram could be added for people who are visual learners?

Underestimation of human labor costs: Good synopsis of business needs. Can you provide more concrete numbers about average costs, time it takes to transfer digital content and so on?

Responses to Challenges: Small formatting errors exists i the form of no or extra spaces between commas and words.The lists need to be better defined. For example: "Specialized research institutions[21][22] There are three elements for essential needs of institutions dealing with issues of digital curation (insert colon), Leadership, Resources, and Collaboration."

I would remove this sentence: "It might be seen as a recipe for digital curation."

Edit: "Importantly, (make lowercase c) Collaboration in archives"

DaniSchuh (talk) 15:31, 2 May 2019 (UTC)Danielle SchuhDaniSchuh (talk) 15:31, 2 May 2019 (UTC)