User talk:Yuan52335233

Welcome!
Hello, Yuan52335233, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! --  李博杰  &#124; —Talk contribs email 05:25, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Your article has been moved to AfC space
Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Yuan52335233/The Sino-Japanese Normalization of Diplomatic Relations has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Sino-Japanese Normalization of Diplomatic Relations, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article. Your draft is waiting for a review by an experienced editor, if you have any questions please ask on our Help Desk! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 02:32, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Nathan2055talk - contribs 16:24, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Senkaku Islands dispute
Hi Yuan, as a new user you probably don't know that Senkaku Islands dispute, and all articles related to Senkaku Islands, are under discretionary sanctions. This means that the normal rules prohibiting edit warring are strengthened. If someone reverts an edit of yours on that page, you need to go to the article's talk page and discuss it. I reverted your addition because it violated several Wikipedia policies, was poorly written, and duplicated material already in the article. Please undo your edits, then go and discuss the issue there. If you do continue to try to force your version into the article, you may end up either blocked or topic banned. Thank you. Qwyrxian (talk) 13:13, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi Qwyrxian, you are right, I don't know the Discretionary sanctions.But If I found some evidence is not ture or controversial,what should I do?I accept my poor edit because English is not my native language.Actually I edit the page with hope that You can revise  my edit and distract my basic information. The purpose Why wiki appears is to shows people the real facts of the world. I know you want to avoid edit warring, but that's not edit warring,what I showed is to uncover the evidnece, not to war any editor. So when the facts shown in your page are controversial,You don't need to make a judgment,you just can list all different voices. but if you just remove the single side's voice,that's not fair. For example.fact:1958 China published " Atlas of the world ". It showed the " Senkaku Islands " in Okinawa --Japan side: It showed the " Senkaku Islands " in Okinawa. It can be as a evidence that china accepted that Senkaku Islands belong to japan in 1958. --Chinese side: china didn't accept that Senkaku Islands belong to japan in 1958.this book's cover page stated: some Chinese borders is based on the map before Second Sino-Japanese War. (Yuan52335233 (talk) 03:05, 19 August 2012 (UTC))
 * Hi Yuan, I was dropping by to talk about this, too. One important Wikipedia policy to keep in mind is that all information must be cited to a reliable source. This is particularly important in controversial cases. It appears to me in edits like this one that you are not providing a source. Can you give a reliable source for this per the policy at WP:RS? If not, unfortunately, it will have to be removed.
 * If you are worried about your English, another option would be to leave a note at the talk page about the information you wish to include, and other editors (me included) will be happy to discuss and see if it would be a good addition to the article. Cheers, Khazar2 (talk) 03:33, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Khazar2's points are excellent. You are absolutely right, Yuan, that we do need to not make judgments and list all relevant voices, but to do that, we need reliable sources. And, to be a little more accurate, we don't need to list every single different point--articles should not become a mass of "A says X. But B says A is wrong because of Y. But A says Y is wrong because of Z." That's just not good writing. To be honest the whole page needs a bit of an overhaul, since it's kind of scattered and confusing. But the way to fix it is not to add in after each point a refutation from the other side. As Khazar2 says, since that article is under additional editing restrictions, the best way to make improvements is through dialogue. Just make a simple post at the bottom of the talk page saying "I found this source, and it says X. Is there a way to include this in the article?" Qwyrxian (talk) 22:41, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi Qwyrxian,Khazar2, the Japanese evidence on the page "Senkaku Islands dispute" now are spreading among chinese.Now lots of chinese are heckling the china government.So the china government's pundit have to write a article to reply. The article below has lists the chinese government's evidence and at the end of the article it replys to all the japanese evidence. It's an chinese official idea. Actually it's a long and professional article and it's really hard for translator.But it may be the first completely description from chinese government. I don't know if any one can translate this article and add more information to the page "Senkaku Islands dispute". This is the source I used for my prevous edit(Yuan52335233 (talk) 02:21, 26 August 2012 (UTC))


 * Please do not add unsourced material to that page. It is too contentious to leave information there unsourced. Qwyrxian (talk) 04:22, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
 * And now, please stop adding pictures of primary documents. Those are not reliable sources for anything other than exactly what they say (no interpretation at all), they aren't useful to basically all readers (since this is en.wiki, the non-English letters, etc. have no value), and including them is WP:UNDUE, because you're trying to use the pictures to lend support to one side of the argument. Instead, please find reliable secondary sources that discuss these documents. Qwyrxian (talk) 06:11, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Cairo Declaration.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Cairo Declaration.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:18, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Sino-Japanese Normalization of Diplomatic Relations concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Sino-Japanese Normalization of Diplomatic Relations, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:07, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission The Sino-Japanese Normalization of Diplomatic Relations


Hello Yuan52335233. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled The Sino-Japanese Normalization of Diplomatic Relations.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 18:02, 25 November 2013 (UTC)