User talk:Yuhan19/sandbox

Review
Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?

Everything is relevant and makes sense for the article.

Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?

Sources 3 and 5 could be out of date; from 2007 and 2003 respectively. I know that the advent of the USDA organic label did not happen until 2010 (I believe; I could be wrong it might have been the EU label).

What else could be improved?

What is the difference between an organic fertilizer and naturally occurring fertilizer in the original published article? I feel like those sentences in the first paragraph are somewhat similar.

Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?

The article is overall neutral with only a few slip-ups. The last sentence in your history paragraph sounds like a claim. For the Organic vs Chemical, simplify your points down into simple statistics or facts; the ones in there currently are phrased in a way resembling an argumentative paragraph. Do not provide a resolution/conclusion like in the last sentence: that is your stance. Many sources should be cited in order make that claim (more than one).

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

The article is well-balanced, so I wouldn't say anything is over or underrepresented.

Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?

The links work and the sources appear credible. Number 5 is interesting. There's some German in that title.

Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?

Source number 1 could be a little biased. They have a section on their website about their political views, so maybe address those. Furthermore, their "about" section says "coming soon." However, the information coming from source 1 seems relevant and useful.

Now take a look at how others are talking about this article on the talk page.

What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? There don't appear to be any recent conversations going on, but beware that bias control has come up in the past.

So I kind of just took your questions from your sandbox and posted them here with answers for a review. Let me know if you have any questions. I wasn't sure if you wanted me to answer them but they seemed helpful. I compared the actual article to what you and your partners have in your sandboxes and I think there are some great additions! Laschv (talk) 05:10, 12 May 2019 (UTC)