User talk:Yukeshrbs

Speedy deletion nomination of Suresh Bhattarai
Hello Yukeshrbs,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Suresh Bhattarai for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

TonyBallioni (talk) 20:56, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

March 2017
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you create an inappropriate page, as you did at Suresh Bhattarai. Please do not use copy and paste copyright violations as articles on Wikipedia. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:58, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bhoral (March 13)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bhoral and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:44, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bhoral LLP


A tag has been placed on Bhoral LLP, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. red dogsix (talk) 02:22, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Final warning
After going through your contributions, I also deleted two additional advertising articles written in the style of a CV. We do not accept promotional content for anyone or anything, including CVs and company "profiles". If you once again write promotional material, you will be blocked from editing. Please ensure any future material you write is strictly neutral in both tone and content. If you create a new article, it must also meet the requirements for notability. Finally, if an article is declined as a draft, that is not an indication you should go ahead and create it anyway. Seraphimblade Talk to me 03:31, 14 March 2017 (UTC), Fuck you Yukeshrbs

March 2017
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Seraphimblade Talk to me 13:26, 14 March 2017 (UTC)


 * So, I gave you a final warning to stop creating inappropriate articles. Instead, you created a sock puppet account, and created them again. I meant to stop creating the articles, not to create them under a different account (which is strictly against policy). Accordingly, both your sock puppet account and this one are blocked indefinitely. Seraphimblade Talk to me 13:27, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Person in a sleeping selfie.jpg


The file File:Person in a sleeping selfie.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused personal photo. Out of scope."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 07:27, 27 March 2022 (UTC)