User talk:Yul B. Allwright

Feedback
Hi, I left some feedback for your sandbox here! Elysia (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:35, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
 * , Hi Elysia, thanks for the previous feedback! My second article is ready for review too. Two sections (the lead and "animal embryos") are live already on the Embryo article, and I also have material in my sandbox ("plant embryos" section, which I think is mostly finished, and the "research & technology" section, which I restructured but have not addressed content for yet). Thanks again! Yul B. Allwright (talk) 19:42, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
 * , nicely done!
 * I especially appreciate your changes to the lead paragraph of Embryo. I felt like it was pretty technical before but is now much more intelligible to a general audience.
 * I love seeing all the citations! All the content looks really well supported. This is an especially nice change to the previous version where those multiple paragraphs had no citations whatsoever.
 * Ultimately I am really happy with your changes thus far to Embryo--a stance that appears to be echoed, given that your edits have not been tweaked/revised in any way by other members of the community
 * As far as the content in your sandbox about plant embryos and research/technology
 * Missing citations in the second-to-last paragraph for plant embryo
 * Your levels are a little off in the Research and technology section. I find this easiest to fix in editing source. If you have a section that is a level two heading (like "Research and technology"), then it should be subdivided into level three headings (you have subdivided it into level six headings). So instead of 6 "=" before and after the subsection title, it should be 3 (you'll see what I mean when you look at the wikicode).
 * The ART section ends without a citation
 * "See also" and "main" templates should both be at the very top of a section. In the ART section, you have the "See also" template at the bottom.
 * Some of the content in the ART section does not necessarily seem within the scope of the section. The content about miscarriage and abortion could have a clearer link to the development of assisted reproductive technologies.
 * Nicely done overall! As always, let me know if you have any questions. Elysia (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:16, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
 * , thank you so much! Yes I still have quite a bit of work for the Research and technology section, so thank you for the feedback so I can see what to focus on fixing first. I'm guessing I'll want to ask you for another round of feedback once I finish a full draft of that section because it seems like it will be the most challenging one to tackle. Thanks again! Yul B. Allwright (talk) 20:08, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Nicely done overall! As always, let me know if you have any questions. Elysia (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:16, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
 * , thank you so much! Yes I still have quite a bit of work for the Research and technology section, so thank you for the feedback so I can see what to focus on fixing first. I'm guessing I'll want to ask you for another round of feedback once I finish a full draft of that section because it seems like it will be the most challenging one to tackle. Thanks again! Yul B. Allwright (talk) 20:08, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Started a Wikiproject on Science Policy
Hi Yul B. Allwright, I just wanted to let you know that the Wikiproject for Science Policy has been officially created! Thanks for showing your interest in the Science Policy Wikiproject proposal page. It's still a little bare, but with your assistance, I believe that we can make it real nice. I started it based off of the template suggested in the Wikiproject, so any edits are always welcome. I could use help with developing our first goals as well, so any suggestions are welcome! Also, if you're interested in being a participant, please list yourself in the Wikiproject homepage under the section for participants. Lightning1115 (talk) 03:47, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

SLS launch cost
Hi, I would like to solicit your input on a debate around the launch cost of the SLS rocket.

Jadebenn made an edit here : https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Space_Launch_System&diff=929316586&oldid=929241314

And since no one challenged his edit at the time he now considers it a consensus and refuses to revert back to old (and most importantely real) figures.

He refuses to debate my argument therefore I solicit your input into this.

Thanks - Moamem (talk) 04:29, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

I've nominated Anna Gifty Opoku-Agyeman for DYK
You can view it here: Template:Did you know nominations/Anna Gifty Opoku-Agyeman.

I encourage you to nominate future articles you create, expand 5x in size, or improve to GA. You can do so at WP:DYKN.

Sincerely, The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:55, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Anna Gifty Opoku-Agyeman
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 27 July 2020 (UTC)