User talk:Yungli0n

Thanks


MelecieDiancie has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

oh hey, thanks for being like 0.25% faster than me in reverting vandalism! to avoid spamming your notifs with endless WP:Thanks notifs, have this on me! •Melecie!• ~talk~ 04:16, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Jeff Wittek.jpeg


A tag has been placed on File:Jeff Wittek.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement&#32;of https://www.imdb.com/name/nm6785609/mediaviewer/rm3837823489/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 21:01, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Why did you restore gratuitous and unnecessary sexual assault references to examples of electronic color code mnemonics?
Hello Yungli0n. You recently reverted an edit I made to List of electronic color code mnemonics and sent me the following message: "I noticed that you removed topically-relevant content from List of electronic color code mnemonics. However, Wikipedia is not censored. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you."

Thank you for the feedback; I am new to contributing to Wikipedia and still learning how this system works from the perspective of a contributor.

I understand that Wikipedia is not censored, and want to point out that my change was not an act of censoring. Rather I was following this part of the Wikipedia contribution guidelines on Offensive_material: "offensive words and offensive images should not be included unless they are treated in an encyclopedic manner. Material that would be considered vulgar or obscene by typical Wikipedia readers[nb 1] should be used if and only if its omission would cause the article to be less informative, relevant, or accurate, and no equally suitable alternative is available."

The examples I removed are in explicit violation of these guidelines and have no place on Wikipedia. Including those examples helps to prop up and normalize a culture where it is acceptable to use male violence against women as a way to remember things, and is thus  They are in no way required to make the article be more informative, relevant, or accurate, and they are at the tail end of a long list of more suitable alternatives. It must be possible to note that offensive and sexual mnemonics exist (fact) without listing them as if they are neutral.

Now that your message has prompted me to read more about Wikipedia policy I propose to redo my original change, expanding it to remove the entire list of unnecessary examples under the "Offensive" heading, which itself stands in violation of the No_disclaimers policy, reducing that section to the final two paragraphs which point out the harmful impact of using offensive and sexual mnemonics (e.g. causing a person to feel alienated and drop out of MIT).

DavidAlpert875 (talk) 00:30, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Reverting multiple edits in a row
Hi, thanks for your help. The "undo" button on a single edit is not always the best choice when dealing with multiple vandalism revisions in a row. The page Help:Reverting describes alternative approaches. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:55, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Okay, thank you. Yungli0n (talk) 00:24, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Your help desk question
You have a response.— Vchimpanzee  •  talk  •  contributions  •  21:27, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Jeff Wittek
Hello, Yungli0n. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jeff Wittek, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)