User talk:Yuotort

May 2021
Your recent editing history at Pluto (Astro Boy) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Polyamorph (talk) 09:10, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hi Yuotort! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Polyamorph (talk) 18:52, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

August 2021
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Reverse racism, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sangdeboeuf (talk) 23:38, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

I did not add any sort of controversial statements in my corrective edit. Yuotort (talk) 00:02, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Reverse racism. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ''See Talk:Reverse racism. Thank you.'' Sangdeboeuf (talk) 00:24, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

I can SEE it's you, dude! Yuotort (talk) 00:27, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 03:41, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Important notice: post-1992 American politics
For future reference. --Sangdeboeuf (talk) 22:57, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

September 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Donda (album), you may be blocked from editing. Doug Weller talk 13:11, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pumpkin queen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pumpkin festival. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:51, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

notice

 * Also if you continue removing these categories without consensus, you're going to wind up blocked. PRAXIDICAE🌈 03:56, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

August 2022
Your recent editing history at Category:Alt-right terrorism shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. PRAXIDICAE🌈 04:32, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Category:White nationalist terrorism shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. PRAXIDICAE🌈 04:34, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. PRAXIDICAE🌈 04:36, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

August 2022
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 13:08, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
 * By th way if you continue to refer to as male you will be blocked for longer. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 13:11, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Why take such offense to a simple assumption of another user's sex on my part? Yuotort (talk) 16:37, 18 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Once is a mistake, no problem. Continuing to do it after being corrected is deliberate. Doug Weller  talk 17:31, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Because Wikipedia works on showing respect for others. And when you have been asked nor than once not to call a male it indicates that you may not be interested in Civility and more interested in Harassment. The first time may have been a mistake but after being told you should not repeat it. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:44, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

This message on my talk page was literally the first indication I saw of Praxidicae being female. Also, the way you keep referring to the matter makes it sound like a transgender thing. Yuotort (talk) 19:15, 18 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Wow. Doug Weller  talk 19:17, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

What? Yuotort (talk) 19:18, 18 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Your transgender comment is pretty odd. Doug Weller  talk 19:55, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Redirects
Hello. Redirect pages function as possible search terms, and should lead people who search them to an article that's rarely outside the mainspace. Please see the Redirects guideline for more info. Thank you. lol1 VNIO ( I made a mistake?  talk to me ) 22:19, 4 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Yuotort, when people search "Racism against white people", they expect an article about such topic. Reverse racism, though biased/loaded term, does mentions cases of anti-white racism. lol1 VNIO  ( I made a mistake?  talk to me ) 22:29, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

"Anti-white racism" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Anti-white racism and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 4 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. --Sangdeboeuf (talk) 00:00, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Adding non-notable trivia
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Steeve Ho You Fat. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. OhNo itsJamie Talk 03:39, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Bad sources and writing on The Proud Family: Louder and Prouder
While I appreciate that you expanded the description for the "Juneteenth" episode, and the description of Emily, the sources you used for the season 2 reviews and controversy, are not good ones. A good guide to which are reliable sources is listed at WP:RSPSS, which states "there is consensus that Fox News is generally reliable for news coverage on topics other than politics and science...For politics and science, there is consensus that the reliability of Fox News is unclear and that additional considerations apply to its use. As a result, Fox News is considered marginally reliable and generally does not qualify as a "high-quality source" for the purpose of substantiating exceptional claims in these topic areas" (in this case, using Fox News would fall under "politics" topic), and says for New York Post, "There is consensus that the New York Post is generally unreliable for factual reporting especially with regard to politics, particularly New York City politics" (again, this article undoubtedly falls under reporting "with regard to politics"). Not sure about Giant Freaking Robot but the Bounding Into Comics article has the same views as the NY Post and Fox News pieces, and seems to have the same slant. In sum, much better sources could have been used, in order to ensure the article maintains WP:NPOV, ones which I found pretty easily in just searching on Google News for "The Proud Family". I hope this helps in your future editing endeavors. Historyday01 (talk) 00:00, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Shrek characters
Calling this well-reasoned edit of mine "vandalism" is frankly offensive. You are free to add sourced information; you are not free to restore original research. Based on past blocks and warning messages you've received, I see you have a propensity toward edit warring. I strongly discourage you from restoring that edit unaltered. If you don't intend on adding sourced information to that article, leave it be. Throast  { { ping }} me! (talk &#124; contribs) 20:02, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)