User talk:Yuovkov

Proposed deletion of Lyda Verstegen


The article Lyda Verstegen has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one.  Dennis The Tiger  (Rawr and stuff) 06:38, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Additional related notes
Hi! I was unable to locate anything on Ms. Verstegen in regards to other positions she has held. That you added the links to the credentials on Women's Alliance is a good start, but there needs to be other supporting material - in short, provide evidence of this. This is not always foregone. (To note, I did a Google News search for her name and found absolutely nothing.) Is there anything you can provide to the extent of her other positions at the UN, South Africa congress, and other positions as listed? For this, please note the above policy on reliable sources, and take into account that secondary sources will be a winner. -- Dennis The Tiger  (Rawr and stuff) 15:29, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Lyda Verstegen for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lyda Verstegen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lyda Verstegen until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  Dennis The Tiger  (Rawr and stuff) 15:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)