User talk:YuriG

Image tagging for Image:Wolfandaudley small.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Wolfandaudley small.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 14:10, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. ~ Enviroboy TalkContribs - 04:09, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

RE:Your deletion of 'Boxing Rebels'
Please see my talk page. ~ Enviroboy TalkContribs - 21:59, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

No, there certainly is not a lot of "scope for flexibility regarding a person's style of writing" in this project"; we're trying to create a sound reference work. The context in which a piece is written, is an article in an encyclopedia, giving information to persons interested in the subject matter of the article; nothing more, nothing less. The stylistic preferences of the subject are totally irrelevant. What you write in and for the forum is one thing. What you write in and for Wikipedia is another entirely. You may see what we want as "very straight, very dull" by forum standards; but it's what we need and want for this encyclopedia. (Contrast an issue of The Onion with our article on The Onion to see what I mean.) -- Orange Mike 21:33, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Wolfandaudley small.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Wolfandaudley small.jpg I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  MBisanz  talk 22:33, 2 August 2009 (UTC)