User talk:Yusuf ibn Tashfin~enwiki

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --  Szvest     Wiki me up ®  14:31, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Your username
Hi YBT. I've noticed that your username is the same as Yusuf ibn Tashfin article. For disambiguation reasons, so that unexperienced readers would not be confused i'd recommend that you have a look at this important section. You can still change your username (tweeking it a bit and leaving most of it if you want) by making a simple request at Changing username. Otherwise, feel free to contact me if you need further help as i am an administrator. Cheers --  Szvest     Wiki me up ®  14:36, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Western Sahara
Hi, Yusuf, I saw your edit war in the article and, as long as your proposal is not actually supported by the source you provided, I've proposed an alternative text, with proper sources. I'd like you to come to the article discussion page and acknowledge my proposal. Best regards --Ecemaml (talk) 11:12, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

I don't understand your comment
Hi Yusuf, I have to recognize that I don't understand your comment. You're claiming that a given statement must be included in a wikipedia article. You've not been able to find a source other than a pro-Morocco entity. So, it's not a suitable source to sustain such a statement and therefore, cannot be included. If such a fact is true, you'd be able to find plenty of sources saying the same. Anyway, do you have any objection to the redaction I've proposed? --Ecemaml (talk) 13:15, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Inappropriate edits
Hi Yusuf, this is the second time you've attempted to edit the section title for "Coordinated action from Moroccan propaganda agents on wikipedia" in Talk:Western Sahara. This is inappropriate behavior. That title was created in good faith by HCPUNXKID. You can respond to him (and you did), but you can't alter the meaning of what he said. --gribeco (talk) 18:56, 25 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Please, avoid personal attacks. They're strictly forbidden. On the other hand, take a look at Talk page guidelines. See this quote: Use English: No matter to whom you address a comment, it is preferred that you use English on English Wikipedia talk pages. This is so that comments may be comprehensible to the community at large. If the use of another language is unavoidable, try to also provide a translation of the comments. Therefore, I'd like you to provide a translation of your message to Omar, just to show how you not only violate policies on personal attacks but on canvassing. I've asked for advise on how to deal with your disruptive behaviour, but possibly at the end of the day I'll have to go to ANI. Best regards --Ecemaml (talk) 18:36, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Yusuf, I'm trying to decide whether to block your account for disruptive editing. Please can you take the time to respond at User talk:MSGJ at your earliest convenience. Thank you &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:32, 28 March 2011 (UTC)


 * I am afraid you do not seem to understand what other users told you here, as you go on with disruptive edits, e.g. by malevolently suppressing a link towards a UN resolution and adding a "reference needed" banner. Be assured your actions are not going unnoticed. --Pylambert (talk) 20:19, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

reverting my last edit
Hi, you've reverted my last edit in an article about relations between Morocco and Algeria without any motive, [], I've commented my contribution in a discussion page if you're not agree please discuss. If you are not able to discuss please restore my last edit. Thank you Kind regards. --Yusuf ibn Tashfin (talk) 13:24, 30 March 2011 (UTC)


 * I have a motive, it's just not worth mentioning anymore. ¦ Reisio (talk) 18:55, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Official language of the Sahrawi republic
On the Sahrawi Arabic Democratic Republic a recurring issue going back over years is that some editors insist on including Spanish in the info box. This would be fine if Spanish was an official language but it is not: Constitution - Article 4:La langue arabe est la langue nationale officielle.[Trans: The Arab language is the national official language (no Spanish!)]. I am dropping you a note here because you previously edited this article and not many people are bothered with it so perhaps you could participate and help put down these attempts to include inaccurate information...Thanks. 109.76.199.226 (talk) 08:54, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

July 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Chip123456 20:57, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Please stop
Reverts You're breaking the file name in these reverts and I have no idea why. Please stop it. We can do the whole WP:BRD thing if you want--you were bold, I reverted, now let's discuss--but stop making a redlink to the image. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:33, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of People of Former French departments of the Sahara


The article People of Former French departments of the Sahara has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No content--I don't know what this is.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 15:51, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of People of Former French departments of the Sahara for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article People of Former French departments of the Sahara is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/People of Former French departments of the Sahara until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:49, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

August 2012
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Elockid  ( Talk ) 01:25, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

"Sexual tourism" on the article "Morocco"
Hello,

Your opinion about the insertion of a long section about "Sexual tourism" on the article "Morocco" would be highly appreciated since you are among the main contributors to the concerned page.

A discussion is ongoing on the Talk page of the article "Morocco".

Thanks in advance, --Omar-toons (talk) 18:03, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Western Sahara: Occupied or Disputed?
It's started back up again at Talk:Western Sahara. I'm telling you this because you were involved in the previous discussion at Talk:Western Sahara. Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 05:54, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Yusuf ibn Tashfin. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Yusuf ibn Tashfin~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 03:31, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 20:48, 22 April 2015 (UTC)